Angel Theory pt.1

M-Systems V4.09

Transcribed by Nick Ray Ball 8th May to 22nd Nov 2016

Dear Professor Stephen Hawking,

This chapter started with a desire to better understand Gravity, I looked

Soon after considering POP as financial gravity, I gained an appetite for Space Time about General Relativity, so I ordered The Grand Design Audio Book.

M-Systems: 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

Mostly taken from ‘The Grand Design’ 2010
By Professor Steven Hawking & Leonard Mlodinow

Other Influencers: Professor Dyson / Ed Witten / Mae Jemison / Kepler / Chen Ning Yang / Robert Mills/ Abdus Salam / Steven Weinberg / Jim Hartle / Bernard Carr / Albert Einstein / Ernst Strauss / Clinton Davisson / Lester Germer/ John Wheeler / Pythagoras/ Issacs Newton / Galileo

Dear Professor Hawking:

M-System: 16

08th May 2016

“A Theory of everything should be so simple that everyone could understand it.”

Professor Stephen Hawking

For 6 years now I worked on an economic version of the theory of everything, after being enchanted by the very name back in May 2011. The enchantment was not the normal wonderment, instead my enchantment was that ‘a theory of everything’ was a perfect way to describe by virtual network design S-World and the system ‘Give Half Back’ which collectively created so much good in the world, that the words ‘a theory of everything’ were well suited.

On the 2nd May 2011, I had a conversation with a learned gentleman ‘Anthony Rauba’ about the idea of predicting the future, after as I had posted a film treatment created called Galactica 2017 (an adaptation of ‘The Sienna Project’ which was the original inspiration for changing my virtual network design into an economic model) on the Battle Star Galactica Facebook page.

‘Anthony Rauba’ introduced to string theory, which I looked up and read that it was ‘a serious contender for the theory of everything.’ In addition ‘Anthony Rauba’ also presented me with a quote from Isaac Asimov

“You may not predict what an individual may do, but you can put in motion, things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired, thus shaping if not predicting the future.”

This quote became pivotal in my work, and is now manifested into M-System 14 Angel cities, and in particular Angel City 5 which is the concept of creating a perfect simulated future for our children’s, children’s in 2080 and working backwards creating many threads that can be followed forward to create such a paradise.

Soon after learning about the existence of string theory, I happened to consider Chaos Theory, as at the time there was a raging bull of a two-year-old causing chaos wherever she wished, so we called her Chaos.

I was enchanted by Chaos Theory and the problem it presented, in particular towards rounding errors causing chaos in long term forecasting. So I started an exercise in pure math, that really was just for the fun of it, I did not seriously to solve it, and even if I did, it was seemingly a very small win, in comparison to creating software that removed humans from the accounting process. (which was a signiant part of the S-World economic plan)

Here are 3 links that tell the story of the solution I created called POP (The Pressure of Profit Investment Principle): S-World 2011, The Network on a Sting 2012 & M-Systems 2015.

In brief, the POP solution is for each group or individual company to have a point of profit, where after, all additional profit goes into creating a new company. This creates solid blocks of profit that can be measured accurately. Each POP point to be a specific value, (say $1,000,000) where after the ‘buckets’ of profit would be counted within a cubed hierarchy, and so it would be very hard to create rounding errors in the first place. This was not a complete solution, but it was an improvement.

The penny dropped when I created the following graphic.

In making this graphic, I saw that as time went by the POP principle created new companies (or at the time big networks of companies, each occupying a large resort development) faster and faster, the more companies that contributed their profit over their POP point, the more profit was available to create new companies. Hence the name ‘The Pressure of profit’ (POP)

I saw this graphic as a kind of gift, a gift created by trying to create a less chaotic system, and whist it is in fact very simple it is also very powerful. I applied this system first to Greece and on paper the hypothesis solved their problems, and not long after I applied it to the USA, for which I needed to make an adaptation called Baby POP, that was not so strict. But again, on paper it worked. As soon as the math was correct I wrote a book called American Butterfly: ‘The Theory of Every Business.’

However as I got to the 7th chapter I was introduced to quantum mechanics via Garret Lisi’s TED talk, and the ‘Eureka’ bell sounded again. As the network was designed to be a virtual network (a project I had started in 2000) I could send a copy of the virtual network forward in time and businesses could do simulated business in the future, and chose weather or not to follow the simulated business in real time, following winning scenarios and avoiding less desirable results.

This opened the ‘physics influenced’ flood gates and I wrote two more American Butterfly books exploring different areas in theoretical physics. Book 2 ‘Spiritually Inspired software’ (also called quantum economics) and Book 3 ‘The Network on a String.’

At that time, I did not have it, I thought I did, but looking back three years, these books only made sense to myself and many of the points created were just exploratory. I did send a copy of ‘The Network on a String’ to Mrs Mobbs from DAMTP along with five bouquets of flowers, but I did not receive a reply.

At the time, this hurt, and those around me though I was bat crazy. And maybe I was. So, I created a new book called ‘The Butterfly’ that was in essence a big SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis. Within which the lack of a working prototype was considered a major weakness, so I applied myself to making the prototype and learning system architecture. And as it so happed, that was a good thing as in the years that followed I created a number of working prototypes and I am now competent at systems and software design.

However, in March 2016, I once again was dawn back to theoretical physics and in particular string theory, and I stared to reverse engineer the American Butterfly macroeconomic plan into a corresponding microeconomic plan for my real world company Villa Secrets. This started the process of creating a microeconomic system and finding the way to make the POP and Give Half Back principles work within what was essentially a franchise or licenced business agreement. One can see this work network.villasecrets.com. This was essential work, and it took quite some time to perfect a working business model, but by working hand in hand with the physics eventually a model was created that was liked by each would be S-World company/franchise owner. Which allowed for both POP and Give Half Back.

As I worked the system and re acquainted myself with my previous works, I started to look once again a POP, and I was helped along the way by a revising of the documentary ‘How small is the universe’ in which Professor Michel Green inspired M-System 2, the M&B String and Dr Giovanni Amelino-Camelia said.

‘When you’re stuck chasing a certain answer, you often discover that all it took to find the answer was to look at the same problem from a different angle.’

And it may also have been his words on space time as Cappuccino foam, but the result was instead of looking at POP as Chaos Theory, I instead considered it as general relativity, due in part to professor Brain Greene’s visual representation of gravity (both Newtonian and Eisenstein) a cubed state.

When this penny finally dropped and I looked at POP as general relativity, it became the missing part in my TOE model. I had string theory and quantum mechanics but until that point there was no general relativity. And in truth until that flash of inspiration I really had no idea what general relativity actually was.

By describing it as a part of what is really a business plan it all made sense. And significantly it would not take much to explain to everyone. If anyone was interested to learn that is, however as S-World is primarily a theory of money and philanthropy, which can be accurately described as ‘sent from the heavens.’ It has the potential to become universally popular.

Which brings us back to your quote

“A Theory of everything should be so simple that everyone could understand it.

I shall now do some research on works.

Retrospective Note

By Nick Ray Ball 14th Dec 2016

The research that followed was a God send, I soon found your audio book ‘The Grand Design’ and I listened to it on my daily walks, a great many times and transcribed the most relevant details (found below). I was so pleased to hear in the first chapter that the book was about M-Theory and it’s likely that if not for that detail, the system name would not be M-System’s

But there was a lot more that M-Theory, and in particular how to rate a good model or theory, which greatly influenced the work, and in addition the passage that mentions that by following the laws of nature we create an economically compressed mode. This gave president to following the laws of nature in economics.

Up until I read that passage, as is mentioned numerous times in my works, I had often written words to the effect that ‘it did not matter if some areas within S-Worlds M-Systems did not follow the actual physics as we were not creating a simulation of our universe, rather we were cherry picking the best mathematical principals and using them in our own model.’

This principle has now changed, to looking at all times to follow the laws of nature as is described within M Theory and associated works.

Also of great influence was the details on quantum mechanics and the Feynman sum over histories, which created a far more scientific version of M-System 14 Angel Cities.

As for POP, that has come on now as well as I came to appreciate the difference between Newtonian space and space time, via the principle that orbits are simply the nearest way for an object to move in a straight line in 3-dimensional space. And only last week I considerd a general relativity picture of POP.

For POP to be considered in general reality format, and for space time to be understood by the masses, we first need to start with a picture, or more to the point a software program that can be seen visually. We will stick to the cubed format as a standard view, in which each network of companies is seen in a POP cube and we will see cubes inside cubes inside cubes, going 9 or 10 level deep. In which a network will either be in POP (it is making its POP limit and contributing towards the creation of new network) or not, and we can switch views to show only companies that are or are not in POP. A very simple way to look at the weak points in a global economy.

However I now also have the plan for a general reactivity picture as well.

To make this picture most accurate I think we need to consider a 2-dimensional universe on the edge of a black whole. So, we can show the planet earth as the black hole and apply the general relativity only to the objects encoded upon it.

In which each business is a sun in a solar system, and orbiting the sun instead of planets there are the staff and orbiting the planets instead of moons we see the dependents of the staff.

The amount of money that each business generates effect the brightness of the sun, on a map of earth, each business will create its own bubble, its size relative to the income made by the business, and as we look at any location from a distance it will look similar to seeing a Galaxy from a distance as all one will see is the collective brightness of all that individual companies.

But as we zoom in, it will look more like the cappuccino foam as described by Dr Giovanni Amelino-Camelia. With many bubbles, which one can zoom into an analyse. This will become a base component of M-System 11QuESC, the Quantum Economic System Core, so named as people on mass provide the uncertainty and freedom to choose within a mass on line game, that sees their choices analysed and learned from and then output as directives.. repeat, repeat, repert…

Now that we can add this new map for POP in general electivity, that also covers staff and dependents, it’s become another unification.

There is no doubt in my mind that there is so much more, that can be added to this model, and indeed all models in M-Systems, however please consider.

If you were to give all the DAMPT students the PHD subject line… “M-Theory as an economic system.” You would likely get some great work back, however it’s unlikely that the work would have practical value. If it was that easy, someone would have done it already.

However, give the same group of students the same assignment but this time give them access to S-World M-Systems and a lot could be accomplished, far more that the foundation that I have supplied. And whist I have not mentioned in it this text, the recently added M-System 0, the GGW string, is also a very simple but can develop into a highly effective basis for such a system…

The simple description is that all companies will contribute half their profit to S-World, which will in turn use the money in the best interests of the network, our planet and its inheritance. (and note this was and still is the fundamental principle behind the entire network sine the outset)

The more complex update is that each company pays 25% of gross profit to S-World, and S-World is a string, (the GGW-String). Changing the shape of the string changes the way the money is spent, from the Susskind Boost, which uses all the money to boost the profit of the of the company that contributed it, to the Peet Tent that uses the money to create the equivalent of a string Feynman diagram to protect any company that is faring poorly. To the classic Give Half Back philanthropic, ecological, scientist, complexity saving and social special projects

I could go on and on, but I will leave with one final thought

In the begging, in 2011 theoretical physics seemed very important, and the idea was simply that once realised S-World could afford to spend a great deal on same, indeed if we look at the first economic model from Greece, we see the creation of a City of Science

Now, we have the same intention, plus I have created a usable foundation from which we can include the mathematics on M-Theory to assist is our mission to make a better world for our children.

In addition, my work opens up theoretical physics to everyone, as it has not been created by a physicist and has next to no equations, just variables to use in the software. But more over my work is spiritually inspired, and so has the potential for mass appeal and brings us back to the topic of this letter

“A Theory of everything should be so simple that everyone could understand it.”

Thanks you, I hope to see you in the New Year after I have completed the first summary version of M-Systems.

Kind Regards

Nick Ray Bay