Angel Theory Special Projects

Angel Theory Book 1.4

Audacious Ideas

A Philanthropic Theory of Everything

By Nick Ray Ball 24th November 2017

PRESENTING:

Chapter 4: S-World Special Projects

The S-World Special Projects: 16 massive Ecological, Philanthropic, and Complexity Saving initiatives, created as a consequence of developing Grand Networks in locations of abject poverty.

Inspired by Sienna Skye

Happy 8th Birthday My Darling

In 1,495 Words

Version 7.09-tk

Angel Theory Special Projects

An Ecological and Philanthropic Theory of Everything… plus Space.

In the following presentation, we find 16 Special Projects; half of which are ecological, all of which matter. This is not a definitive list, rather it is the beginning of a larger conversation about ‘how can we accomplish as much good as possible?

Before we begin, a note that this chapter is an extension of the first ever chapter to appear on AngelTheory.org; and that the extension of this chapter Book 3.14: ‘Ripple Effects, Elephants, et al.’ is currently the conclusion to Angel Theory, which looks at the same list of special projects, adds a further 10, and describes how each project is created as a consequence of creating a ‘Grand Network’ in Malawi or Zimbabwe (or both).

24 very significant ripple effects created as a consequence of creating the Malawi Grand Network, as is described throughout Angel Theory Book 3.

The GDP Game

The critical point (in terms of ‘how can we accomplish as much good as possible?) is simply that once the software is created, all of the following projects presented are created from the ripple effects of investment not donations.

And so current philanthropic funding can carry on funding what it funds, business and countries can invest in S-World bonds, see a significant return, and accomplish the most good as a part of the process.

The S-World TBS™ (Total Business Software)

We do, however, need such philanthropists in the creation of the software. This said, even the software phase is an investment (and in my opinion the wisest of all S-World opportunities), as it creates the first three Super Projects: 1. S-World TBS ™ (Total Business Systems), 2. S-World VSN™ (Virtual Social Network), and 3. S-World UCS™ (Universal Colonization Simulator). All of which have a significant profit component.

S-World VSN™ (Virtual Social Network)

S-World UCS (Universal Colonization Simulator)

In terms of dollars spent vs. return, the cost of this software development is not cheap, but its potential philanthropic and ecological return is almost limitless; as each Grand Network created in a location of abject poverty activates 20 plus special projects in its location. And so, the answer to ‘How can we accomplish as much good as possible?’ is… Help me develop the S-World software.

Special Project 1. Angel City 1 ‘Experience Africa’ (2020)

Special Project 1. Experience Africa is already underway, as the 20 unique and beneficial systems of Villa Secrets are set to create superior systems for the safari industry and thousands of related businesses; which by 2020 has the potential to provide game changing funding for the protection of Elephants, Rhinos, Cheetahs, and other endangered animals.

Special Project 2. The Ecological Economy

The second of 8 ecological Special Projects, The Ecological Economy goes back to the very beginning of S-World and the movie ‘The Sienna Project,’ in which Sienna shows me, her father ‘The Ecological Experience Economy’ (EEE). This economy protects our planet!

the ecological economy

Special Project 3. Advancing Human Potential

One purpose of the software and systems: S-World VSN, S-World VBN, & S-World UCS is to advance human potential by giving everyone the systems to compete with the big guys, and then see them all flourish as equity holders in the new S-World network economy.

advancing human potential

Special Project 4. Cities of Science

Another early ambition now turned special project, Super-grand-networks (large city sized resort developments) dedicated to scientific exploration. Plus, in general, funding for science.

cities of science

Special Project 5. Equality & The Poverty Gap

This system is very old and now very advanced. It is all of M-System 6. ‘The Theory of Every Business,’ ‘M-System 15. Angel POP,’ and it is Einstein’s theory of general relativity within the E-TOE (Economic Theory of Everything).

equality & the poverty gap - the theory of everything

Special Project 6. Sienna’s Forests

Initially made for grand networks, which would need to buy rainforests to be forever preserved, or create new forests so their ecological footprint balances. Now, also a general principle to commoditise rainforest so they are too expensive to log.

siennas forests

Special Project 7. Global Cooling

Supporting Tesla and others and creating massive solar projects. Within grand networks, each property is sold with a budget (usually 6.25% of the cost of the home) for an electronic car. Only electronic cars or select top end sports and prestige cars can drive in grand networks.

global cooling

Special Project 8. Universal Knowledge

Each grand network development has a university that teaches subjects that lead to skills needed to get a good S-World job. Plus, S-World VSN and UCS provide open university courses.

universal knowledge

Special Project 9. Spartan Contracts

Nongraduate opportunities. Give us 16 years work and you will own your own home. Take gap years, construction workers can follow the sun and move from grand network to network and see the world. Nurses can do the same with the opportunity to train as doctors.

spartan contracts

Special Project 10. Global Healthcare

Each grand network development is built around an ‘SURH,’ a Super University Resort Hospital; a 5 to 7-star experience with extremely expensive ‘Medi-Villas’ attached. The objective of the network is to create networks evenly around the world, so everyone is near one SURH or another.

global healthcare

Special Project 10b. Limiting Antibiotics

This special project seeks solutions to the problem of the overuse of Antibiotics. This problem is very misunderstood, but simple enough to summarise. If we carry on as we are, there will only be resistant bacteria left and we’re all going to die! We can start by stopping it and not putting it on crops.

limiting antibiotics

Special Project 11. African Rain

A mass solar desalinization project for North and East Africa, the Middle East, USA, and other locations. Creating super grand networks (Over 100 sq. miles) in desert locations by adding water.

african rain

Special Project 12. Their Oceans

An apocalyptic problem for the Ocean’s population are the plastic bags, packaging, & straws that are thrown away. Every single day, over 500 million straws are thrown away in the USA alone. There are perfectly good paper straws that would do for a cost of only a tenth of a cent more.

their oceans

Special Project 13. Middle Earth

This is a very cool project that has commercial applications, building underground resort developments (in particular) in location of poor weather. This expensive and very long-term project saves our asses in all sorts of ELE (Extinction Level Event) scenarios.

middle earth

Special Project 14. The Population Point

This, the hardest of all special projects to apply without affecting free will, has a radical solution made possible by the E-TOE. Most 1st world economic countries’ population is static, we must replicate the economics across the globe (see Angel POP & the E-TOE).

the population point

Special Project 15. The Spartan Theory

The Spartan Theory is whatever will bring peace; from dictators stepping down from politics to live and have a small say over the new super-grand-networks in their country, to all countries pitching in to the fight against poaching and fighting side by side against a common enemy.

the spartan theory

Special Project 16. Universal Colonization

This is the ultimate achievement in the S-World UCS game. The ultimate special project, flying ourselves to the stars in a fleet of ships, speeding our complexity (our essence) across the galaxy, ensuring our survival come what may.

s-world ucs - an economic theory of everything

This special project has been made much more achievable due to Elon Musk’s ambitions to create a transport system to MARS. If Musk wishes to provide the transportation, then S-World wishes to become the developers, the O2 and H2O suppliers, and the leaders in MARS industries; as we export the theory of every business to MARS Resort 1, a 10,000 square KM stellar-grand-network.

mars resort1

Branding…

Going back a few years, while researching branding for my pitch to VIRGIN back in 2008 and 2009, I took my Cape Villas team (from management to domestics) to ‘Enlighten’ branding lectures and boot camps.

From the lectures, the clip I remember most was of a janitor sweeping the floor; who when asked ‘what are you doing?’ looked curiously and said simply, ‘I’m sweeping the floor.’

This was followed by a clip of a NASA janitor, also sweeping the floor; who when asked the same question replied proudly: ‘I’m helping put a man on the moon!’

Space did that, and whilst space has not been in vogue for a while now, thanks to Virgin Galactic & Elon Musk’s SpaceX’ providing a very credible initiative to get to space and Mars on mass, there is new interest. And this mission can be a great unifier of nations and rallier of teams once again, as all who work with and for S-World can proudly say about their day’s efforts:

‘We are helping build a colony on Mars.’

s-world grand networks - an economic theory of everything

s-world ucs - mars resort

special project - mars resort

res equation - financial equivalence - an economic theory of everything

special project - mars resort - the theory of everything

Marx, Kuznets and FIAT Currency

Angel Theory Part 3.3

The GDP Game (Audacious Economics)

The Theory of Every Business 2.0

A work in progress by Nick Ray Ball 16th January 2017

Capital in the 21 st Century - by Thomas Piketty

PRESENTING:

Chapter 3: Cube vs Pyramid and FIAT Currency

From Thomas Piketty’s ‘Capital in the 21st Century,’ we examine the economic predictions of Malthus, Young, Ricardo, Marx & Kuznets. Then via the documentary ‘End of the Road: How Money Became Worthless,’ we examine the probability and a potential cure for a USD FIAT currency crash.

Along this journey we examine the differences between the US Federal Reserve and Pyramid/Ponzi Schemes in comparison with the Gold Standard Cubic financial gravity of the S-World Bond.

End of the Road - How Money Became Worthless

In 7,318 Words

Version 6.95-t-k2

Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Before we go to Tim Delmastro’s documentary ‘End of the Road: How Money Became Worthless’ and the FIAT currency, we will start this chapter with a whiz through economic history courtesy of Thomas Piketty’s ‘Capital in the 21st Century,’ in an attempt not to overly worry the reader, as many extreme economic predictions have been made in history, and none have come true.

Capital in the 21st Century - by Thomas Piketty

Please note that the text in this font, that does not have a source is by Thomas Piketty staring with:

Malthus, Young, and the French Revolution

For Thomas Malthus, who in 1798 published his Essay on the Principle of Population, there could be no doubt: the primary threat was overpopulation. One particularly important influence was the travel diary published by Arthur Young, an English agronomist who travelled extensively in France from 1787–1788, on the eve of the French Revolution.

France at that time was by far the most populous country in Europe and therefore an ideal place to observe. The kingdom could already boast of a population of 20 million in 1700, compared to only 8 million for Great Britain (and 5 million for England alone). The French population increased steadily throughout the eighteenth century, and by 1780 was close to 30 million.

There is every reason to believe that this unprecedentedly rapid population growth contributed to a stagnation of agricultural wages and an increase in land rents in the decades prior to the explosion of 1789.

When Reverend Malthus published his famous Essay in 1798, he reached some radical conclusions, he was very afraid of the new political ideas emanating from France, and to reassure himself that there would be no comparable upheaval in Great Britain he argued that all welfare assistance to the poor must be halted at once and that reproduction by the poor should be severely scrutinized lest the world succumb to overpopulation leading to chaos and misery!

As we know, England did not stop welfare assistance or put in place any low population mechanisms. But France did revolt, and I dare say if they did not overpopulate, this would not have happened, and we would have a very different world today. It is of course worth mentioning that in 1979 China did introduce a one-child policy.

Huge disparities in per capita (all income / all population) income are created by overpopulation, and continue today, if we look at Southern Africa, Malawi, and the countries it borders.

Country Population GDP Per Capita
Malawi 18.09 5.44 $ 301
Zimbabwe 16.15 16.29 $ 1,008
Botswana 2.25 15.27 $ 6,788
Mozambique 28.8 11.01 $ 382
Zambia 16.59 19.55 $ 1,178

A quick look at the above and in terms of the average an individual earns, Botswana wins by a country mile 6 times greater than any rival, and the average Botswanan makes more than 20 times the average Malawian, and the obvious statistic in common is overpopulation.

Ricardo: The Principle of Scarcity

Most contemporary observers—and not only Malthus and Young—shared relatively dark or even apocalyptic views of the long-run evolution of the distribution of wealth and class structure of society. This was true in particular of David Ricardo and Karl Marx, who were surely the two most influential economists of the nineteenth century and who both believed that a small social group— landowners for Ricardo, industrial capitalists for Marx—would inevitably claim a steadily increasing share of output and income.

He was above all interested in the following logical paradox. Once both population and output begin to grow steadily, land tends to become increasingly scarce relative to other goods. The law of supply and demand then implies that the price of land will rise continuously, as will the rents paid to landlords. The landlords will therefore claim a growing share of national income, as the share available to the rest of the population decreases, thus upsetting the social equilibrium. For Ricardo, the only logically and politically acceptable answer was to impose a steadily increasing tax on land rents.

This sombre prediction proved wrong: land rents did remain high for an extended period, but in the end the value of farm land inexorably declined relative to other forms of wealth as the share of agriculture in national income decreased.

It would be a serious mistake to neglect the importance of the scarcity principle for understanding the global distribution of wealth in the twenty-first century. To convince oneself of this, it is enough to replace the price of farmland in Ricardo’s model by the price of urban real estate in major world capitals, or, alternatively, by the price of oil. In both cases, if the trend over the period 1970–2010 is extrapolated to the period 2010–2050 or 2010–2100, the result is economic, social, and political disequilibria of considerable magnitude.

Marx: The Principle of Infinite Accumulation

Karl Marx - Das Kapital

By the time Marx published the first volume of Capital in 1867, exactly one-half century after the publication of Ricardo’s Principles, economic and social realities had changed profoundly: the question was no longer whether farmers could feed a growing population or land prices would rise sky high but rather how to understand the dynamics of industrial capitalism, now in full blossom.

The most striking fact of the day was the misery of the industrial proletariat. Despite the growth of the economy, or perhaps in part because of it, and because, as well, of the vast rural exodus owing to both population growth and increasing agricultural productivity, workers crowded into urban slums. The working day was long, and wages were very low. A new urban misery emerged, more visible, more shocking, and in some respects even more extreme than the rural misery of the Old Regime. Germinal, Oliver Twist, and Les Misérables did not spring from the imaginations of their authors, any more than did laws limiting child labour in factories to children older than eight (in France in 1841) or ten in the mines (in Britain in 1842).

In fact, all the historical data at our disposal today indicate that it was not until the second half—or even the final third—of the nineteenth century that a significant rise in the purchasing power of wages occurred.

From the first to the sixth decade of the nineteenth century, workers’ wages stagnated at very low levels—close or even inferior to the levels of the eighteenth and previous centuries. This long phase of wage stagnation, which we observe in Britain as well as France, stands out all the more because economic growth was accelerating in this period.

In any case, capital prospered in the 1840s and industrial profits grew, while labour incomes stagnated. It was in this context that the first communist and socialist movements developed. The central argument was simple: What was the good of industrial development, what was the good of all the technological innovations, toil, and population movements if, after half a century of industrial growth, the condition of the masses was still just as miserable as before. People therefore wondered about its long-term evolution: what could one say about it?

This was the task Marx set himself. In 1848, on the eve of the “spring of nations” (that is, the revolutions that broke out across Europe that spring), he published The Communist Manifesto, a short, hard-hitting text whose first chapter began with the famous words:

“A spectre is haunting Europe—the spectre of communism.”

Karl Marx - The Communist Manifesto

The text ended with the equally famous prediction of revolution: “The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own gravediggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.”

Over the next two decades, Marx laboured over the voluminous treatise that would justify this conclusion and propose the first scientific analysis of capitalism and its collapse. This work would remain unfinished: the first volume of Capital was published in 1867, but Marx died in 1883 without having completed the two subsequent volumes. His friend Engels published them posthumously after piecing together a text from the sometimes obscure fragments of manuscript Marx had left behind.

Like Ricardo, Marx based his work on an analysis of the internal logical contradictions of the capitalist system. He therefore sought to distinguish himself from both bourgeois economists (who saw the market as a self-regulated system, that is, a system capable of achieving equilibrium on its own without major deviations, in accordance with Adam Smith’s image of “the invisible hand” and Jean-Baptiste Say’s “law” that production creates its own demand), and utopian socialists and Proudhonians, who in Marx’s view were content to denounce the misery of the working class without proposing a truly scientific analysis of the economic processes responsible for it. In short, Marx took the Ricardian model of the price of capital and the principle of scarcity as the basis of a more thorough analysis of the dynamics of capitalism in a world where capital was primarily industrial (machinery, plants, etc.) rather than landed property, so that in principle there was no limit to the amount of capital that could be accumulated.

In fact, his principal conclusion was what one might call the “principle of infinite accumulation,” that is, the inexorable tendency for capital to accumulate and become concentrated in ever fewer hands, with no natural limit to the process.

This is the basis of Marx’s prediction of an apocalyptic end to capitalism: either the rate of return on capital would steadily diminish (thereby killing the engine of accumulation and leading to violent conflict among capitalists), or capital’s share of national income would increase indefinitely (which sooner or later would unite the workers in revolt). In either case, no stable socioeconomic or political equilibrium was possible.

Marx’s dark prophecy came no closer to being realized than Ricardo’s. In the last third of the nineteenth century, wages finally began to increase: the improvement in the purchasing power of workers spread everywhere, and this changed the situation radically, even if extreme inequalities persisted and in some respects continued to increase until World War I.

Comment from Nick Ray…

In studying and editing this section about the economists Thomas Malthus, David Ricardo, and famously Karl Marx, it seems that in each case their future predictions were based in their current circumstances. Thomas Malthus saw mass overpopulation lead France to revolution and wrote of the perils of overpopulation going forwards, which are now a significant worry going forwards but did not come to pass in the period he made his prediction.

David Ricardo wrote of the scarcity of land and it leading to a greater and greater income inequality, because that was what was happening at the time he wrote his prediction based on same, unaware that in 50 years’ time, the industrial revolution saw a lowering in the price of land.

And famously, Karl Marx wrote about what was happening in his time, and projected it forwards as his theory of infinite acumination, only to see inequality to decrease from 1870 to 1950 due to the World Wars, Revolutions, US Depression, and ripple effects of same.
In the case of Ricardo and Marx, both made future predictions on current circumstances and did not factor in yet unforeseen changes. They did not factor for Black Swan, ‘an unpredictable or unforeseen event,’ typically one with extreme consequences.

And they certainly did not set about creating a system like Angel Theory to replace the idea of predicting the future instead to making the future. And for more on this, see M-Systems 12. S-World UCS, 13. UCS Voyager, & 14 Angel Cities.

For now, and for this chapter, it is enough to know that historical economists’ prophesies of doom have not been born out, but that is not to say they are not useful tools, one still applies the logic, but considers the logic of only one of a few, or sometimes many sources.

Before we get to the principal of S-World Bonds becoming an insurance for a FIAT currency collapse, we must look at the work of Simon Kuznets.

From Marx to Kuznets, or Apocalypse to Fairy Tale

Simon Kuznets -1971 Nobel Prize Winner

Turning from the nineteenth-century analyses of Ricardo and Marx to the twentieth-century analyses of Simon Kuznets, we might say that economists’ no doubt overly developed taste for apocalyptic predictions gave way to a similarly excessive fondness for fairy tales, or at any rate happy endings. According to Kuznets’s theory, income inequality would automatically decrease in advanced phases of capitalist development, regardless of economic policy choices or other differences between countries, until eventually it stabilized at an acceptable level.

Proposed in 1955, this was really a theory of the magical postwar years referred to in France as the “Trente Glorieuses,” the thirty glorious years from 1945 to 1975. For Kuznets, it was enough to be patient, and before long growth would benefit everyone. The philosophy of the moment was summed up in a single sentence:

“Growth is a rising tide that lifts all boats.”

A similar optimism can also be seen in Robert Solow’s 1956 analysis of the conditions necessary for an economy to achieve a “balanced growth path,” that is, a growth trajectory along which all variables—output, incomes, profits, wages, capital, asset prices, and so on—would progress at the same pace, so that every social group would benefit from growth to the same degree, with no major deviations from the norm. Kuznets’s position was thus diametrically opposed to the Ricardian and Marxist idea of an inegalitarian spiral and antithetical to the apocalyptic predictions of the nineteenth century.

In any event, the data that Kuznets collected allowed him to calculate the evolution of the share of each decile, as well as of the upper centiles, of the income hierarchy in total US national income. What did he find? He noted a sharp reduction in income inequality in the United States between 1913 and 1948. More specifically, at the beginning of this period, the upper decile of the income distribution (that is, the top 10 percent of US earners) claimed 45–50 percent of annual national income. By the late 1940s, the share of the top decile had decreased to roughly 30–35 percent of national income. This decrease of nearly 10 percentage points was considerable: for example, it was equal to half the income of the poorest 50 percent of Americans. The reduction of inequality was clear and incontrovertible. This was news of considerable importance, and it had an enormous impact on economic debate in the postwar era in both universities and international organizations.

Malthus, Ricardo, Marx, and many others had been talking about inequalities for decades without citing any sources whatsoever or any methods for comparing one era with another or deciding between competing hypotheses. Now, for the first time, objective data were available. Although the information was not perfect, it had the merit of existing. What is more, the work of compilation was extremely well documented: the weighty volume that Kuznets published in 1953 revealed his sources and methods in the most minute detail, so that every calculation could be reproduced. And besides that, Kuznets was the bearer of good news: inequality was shrinking.

The Kuznets Curve: Good News in the Midst of the Cold War

In fact, Kuznets himself was well aware that the compression of high US incomes between 1913 and 1948 was largely accidental. It stemmed in large part from multiple shocks triggered by the Great Depression and World War II and had little to do with any natural or automatic process. In his 1953 work, he analyzed his series in detail and warned readers not to make hasty generalizations. But in December 1954, at the Detroit meeting of the American Economic Association, of which he was president, he offered a far more optimistic interpretation of his results than he had given in 1953. It was this lecture, published in 1955 under the title “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,” that gave rise to the theory of the “Kuznets curve.”

Kuznets Curve

Above, we see the Kuznets Curve below, his optimistic idea simply that as industrialization increased at first, we would see inequality worsen. But as time goes on, inequality improves. This optimistic view was almost the exact opposite of Karl Marx, whose hypothesis was the opposite suggesting that inequality would simply get worse and worse as time passes.

According to this theory, inequality everywhere can be expected to follow a “bell curve.” In other words, it should first increase and then decrease over the course of industrialization and economic development. According to Kuznets, a first phase of naturally increasing inequality associated with the early stages of industrialization, which in the United States meant, broadly speaking, the nineteenth century, would be followed by a phase of sharply decreasing inequality, which in the United States allegedly began in the first half of the twentieth century.

Kuznets’s 1955 paper is enlightening. After reminding readers of all the reasons for interpreting the data cautiously and noting the obvious importance of exogenous shocks in the recent reduction of inequality in the United States, Kuznets suggests, almost innocently in passing, that the internal logic of economic development might also yield the same result, quite apart from any policy intervention or external shock. The idea was that inequalities increase in the early phases of industrialization, because only a minority is prepared to benefit from the new wealth that industrialization brings. Later, in more advanced phases of development, inequality automatically decreases as a larger and larger fraction of the population partakes of the fruits of economic growth.

Kuznets, like Ricardo and Marx before him, has created a future prediction based on what was happening at the time. Born in 1901, Kuznets’ view of the world was just like his bell curve. To illustrate, we shall look at the first graph from Piketty’s ‘Capital at the Dawn of the 21st Century’ (his preferred title).

Income Inequality in the United States 1910-2010

Here, we see that in 1929, equality is peaking, and over the next 50 years it could fall within his curve. And that he was correct in recording the data up to realising his paper “Economic Growth and Income Inequality” in 1955. However, he failed to predict that the rebound from the wars and turmoil of the first half of the century, and from the 1990’s the rise of the ‘super manager’ would send income inequality in the opposite direction.

And while we are here, let’s look at the leading industrial nations of Europe, which follows a similar path to the USD, albeit the main shock was World War 1, and that the recovery of inequality was in 1950.

The Capital or Income Ratio in Europe from 1870 to 2010

In all cases in US, UK, France, and Germany; the Kuznets Curve applies at the time Kuznets wrote about it.

The greater point that we see from these economists is that they looked only at what was happening to them at that time, and projected that idea forwards indefinitely, which in each case turned out to be wrong.

The moral of this story is that extreme hellish or heavenly predictions from the leading economists of their day have always been wrong going forwards. There is (I’d say) a portion of truth to all, but to make a prediction for 20 or 50 years’ time solely based on what one knows today continued forwards is likely to be wrong due to ‘Black Swan,’ the idea that something new will be entered in to the equation that will change it radically.

There are a lot of economists and politicians with a negative outlook for the USA and Europe, one of which we shall look to in just one moment. However, as a system that instead of predicting futures creates futures, that has inbuilt equality, for all the doom and gloom S-World will do great good and is the best ‘Black Swan’ (new important event) on the table. Albeit the creation of limitless free energy via fusion would equally be a massive change to the global picture.

Piketty asks:

“Will the world in 2050 or 2100 be owned by traders, top managers and the super-rich? Or will it be owned by the oil rich countries, or the bank of China? Or perhaps it will be owned by the tax heavens in which many of these actors will have sort refuge.

It would be absurd not to raise the question of who will own what, and simply to assume from the outset that growth is naturally balanced in the long run.”

I like Thomas Piketty, as he draws from many different sources, in fact in his book, it takes 10 minutes just to list them. Piketty presents an even-handed view of economics as a spectrum of probabilities, not predictions.

We can see S-World as a modern-day version of the optimistic Kuznets Curve, and we can see the antieconomic views of Keene, Schiff, and others as the worst-case scenario.

S-World Economics

S-World is not built upon the traditional micro or macroeconomic models, which is a good start for any new system. It has mostly been developed via business experiments and simulations and Theory of Everything (M-theory) physics simulations. However, recently, looking at economics has been helping to improve the system.

Peter Schiff’s ‘The Real Crash: America’s Coming Bankruptcy’ was a good find, as it made the economic case for American Butterfly’s ‘Theory of Every Business’ (circa 2012) US economic forecasts (more at http://americanbutterfly.org).

S-World Economics - M-Theory an Ecnomic Science

More recently, Tim Delmastro’s documentary that featured Schiff: ‘End of the Road: How Money Became Worthless’ helped to explain the dangers of ‘FIAT currency.’

In ‘The Real Crash: America’s Coming Bankruptcy – How to Save Yourself and Your Country’ by Peter Schiff, and Tim Delmastro’s documentary ‘End of the Road: How Money Became Worthless’; Delmastro, Schiff, and the other respected economists and financial experts named below tell of the end of gold backed US currency on August 15th, 1971. And how ever since the USD and the world entered into a ‘FIAT’ based currency system (where money could be printed at will) effectively creating a ‘so-called’ global dollar based Ponzi Scheme, that when it ends could (and in fact always has in history) create hyperinflation as was last seen in Zimbabwe in 2008.

The Cast of ‘End of the Road: How Money Became Worthless’

  • Adam Fergusson
  • Mike Maloney
  • Bill Murphy
  • Jim Puplava
  • James Rickards
  • Dimitri Speck
  • Eric Sprott
  • James Turk

American Butterfly

Angel Theory Part 3.2

Audacious Economics

The Theory of Every Business 2.01

A work in progress by Nick Ray Ball 5th January 2018

American Butterfly

PRESENTING:

Chapter 2: American Butterfly

The original reason for classing S-World as economic was that it was a theory of money that was entered in to quite by chance in April 2011, to emerge as the economics vs theoretical physics ‘American Butterfly’ Books 1 to 4 in 2012-2013.

American Butterfly

Inspired by Sienna Skye

In 2,445 Words

Version 6.94-r-k1

American Butterfly Economics

On January 1st, 2012 I started 4 months of economic and US construction research, and the notes alone (as seen on S-World.biz) are the length of 4 novels. And within came my much loved ‘Kobayashi Maru GDP Game,’ named after the ‘no win scenario’ made by Spock in Start Trek that was beaten by Captain Kirk when he reprogrammed the game.

The Kobayashi Maru GDP Game had 13 variables, from Medicare costs to the Interest on the Debt itself, which showed history back to 2009 and future projections for 2013, 2017, 2021, 2025, 2029 and 2033.

The Kobayashi Maru GDP Game

At the bottom of the graphic, the Kobayashi Maru GDP Game plotted…

  1. The GDP Debt Ratio (that the amount of all goods and services sold vs. the debt of the country).
  2. The Cost of Social Security, Medical Liberties, and the Interest on the Debt as a percentage of GDP.

    (However, for simplicity (13 inputs not 89), I averaged as opposed to applying the actual curve. So, we only consider the 2009 & 2033 Social Security, Medical Liberties stats.)

Using the default figures, which were (mostly) accurate for 2011, and then continuing with those figures, the US GDP Debt Ratio started in 2009 at 82.6% and would rise to 169.2% by 2033. And the cost of Social Security, Medical Liberties, and the Interest on the Debt as a percentage of GDP increased from 11.7% in 2009 up to 34.3% in 2033, whereas the usual tax yield is only 18%. And that before we got there, the USA would have to impose massive amounts of austerity, which would in turn slow down GDP, and could spiral into bankruptcy and hyperinflation.

I considered, if there was a first move to solving the global economy, it would be to make sure the USA does not spiral into bankruptcy.

However, the worrying thing about the ‘Kobayashi Maru GDP Game’ was that as you changed the 13 different variables using figures within reason, the USA still reached untenable levels of debt vs commitments, slower maybe but still the same eventual result, too many commitments to pay for vs income and borrowing at a reasonable rate.

At the time, the only way that I could get it to work was by eliminating the Medicare and Medicaid costs, which of course was cheating. But if Captain Kirk can do it, so could I.

The Theory of Every Business

In theory, the S-World solution was to build 8,192 Grand Networks in the USA, and in each is a hospital so that no one was more than 20 miles from care, and branch out into pharmaceuticals and medical technology.

This in exchange for the US or state governments reclassifying the land we needed to build the Grand Networks in the first place from agricultural to industrial, commercial, and residential.

The vehicle behind how we would accomplish this became known as the first American Butterfly book ‘The Theory of Every Business,’ as all the businesses who constructed or later operated within the Grand Network would be part of the S-World network; and collectively, all would contribute to special projects http://americanbutterfly.org/pt1/the-theory-of-every-business/index.

And in this case, a set allocation of funds per year would need to go to Special Project 10. Global Healthcare.

Global Healthcare

Having worked out the objective, the project then changed to practicalities and how to build so many Grand Networks, and how each could afford to cover the medical costs.
With a population of 326 Million, we divided by 8,192 networks and get just under 40,000 people, which we may increase by 10,000 for population growth in 20 or so years, so 50,000 people. And that using a quick sum, the UK NHS costs $3,000 per person; then each resort development needs to pay $150 Million for that sort of service, or $75 Million if the objective was to cover half of the US liabilities, as existing health care can’t just stop and is already in all cities.

And note, as always, before going into actual business, we simulate it in S-World UCS, including very detailed scenarios for the NHS and other governments health systems.

S-World UCS - MMO Tutorial Game

And so, having worked out a solution, the next objective turned into the profitability of a Grand Network whilst factoring in the laws of diminishing returns created by having so many Grand Networks in the first place. And we are still working on that, albeit now the launch is more likely to be in Africa, as we found out from Angle POP, Grand Networks in locations of Special Projects are Special Projects.

One single Grand Network assists all 17 Special Projects.

http://www.angeltheory.org/book/1-4/Special-Projects

President Barack Obama

Fortunately, given that it’s taken 6 more years to create the inner working of the S-World network, President Barack Obama and his economic team had their own ideas about the same problem. For sure they probably had their own version of the ‘Kobayashi Maru GDP Game.’

The Obamas

In ‘Obama’s Game,’ he made 2 bold changes; lowering borrowing by half a trillion a year to an average of $900 Billion, and he lowered interest rates to 0.2%. And it’s amazing, the effect in just 2 years, changing the status quo from a predicted 105.4% GDP debt ratio to a 98.7%, where after it grew at 1.5% a year.

The result of this is that the USA in 2017 is looking at a GDP debt ratio of 105.7% in place of the forecast 122.7%, a great result given the starting conditions. Albeit the lowering of interest rates can cause other problems.

The Kobayashi Maru GDP Game - Obama Wins

As for the cost of Social Security, Medical Liberties, and the Interest on the Debt as a percentage of GDP, I have not remade these figures as accurate medical figures are hard to find. And so, the 15.6% in 2017 is wrong and should not be considered other than the obvious:

With an aging population seeing people live 20 even 30 years longer, that’s going to increase the medical liabilities and social security payments a lot.

And in this case, the American Butterfly medical liabilities plan would still be a life saver, especially now that thanks to President Obama’s last term, the need is now less. And that if all went to plan, covering just half of the medical liabilities plus the extra payroll and income tax contributions from all S-World personnel and companies would be enough to put the USA on the right path, so long as politicians don’t find new ways to spend the money.

However, now 6 years down the road, if we listen to best economics by Thomas Piketty, we find that the best locations for grand networks is in emerging and very small economies.

Too Much Capital Kills the Return on Capital
By Thomas Piketty

From ‘Capital in the Twenty-First Century’ Chapter 6
Capital in the 21st Century

Whatever the rules and institutions that structure the capital-labour split may be…

It is natural to expect that the marginal productivity of capital decreases as the stock of capital increases.

For example, if each agricultural worker already has thousands of hectares to farm, it is likely that the extra yield of an additional hectare of land will be limited.

Similarly, if a country has already built a huge number of new dwellings, so that every resident enjoys hundreds of square feet of living space, then the increase to well-being of one additional building—as measured by the additional rent an individual would be prepared to pay in order to live in that building—would no doubt be very small.

The same is true for machinery and equipment of any kind: marginal productivity decreases with quantity beyond a certain threshold.

(Although it is possible that some minimum number of tools are needed to begin production, saturation is eventually reached.)

Conversely, in a country where an enormous population must share a limited supply of land, scarce housing, and a small supply of tools, then the marginal product of an additional unit of capital will naturally be quite high.

The above classical economics by Thomas Piketty suggests that one is more likely to have success with a ‘Theory of Every Business’ BabyPOP Super Grand Network in a location where there is almost no housing, industry, and retail such as Malawi or Zimbabwe; but equally, I think Greece and India and most of Africa, South America, & Asia.

As for the USA; reducing, borrowing, and creating an annual surplus year after year will go a long way to avoid the problems highlighted in the documentary: ‘End of the Road, How Money Became Worthless.’

American Butterfly Book 2: Spiritually Inspired Software

http://americanbutterfly.org/pt2/spiritually-inspired-software/index-spiritually-inspired-software

American Butterfly Book 2 started with…

Chapter 1.The Entangled Butterfly’ and seeks to introduce chaos theory and quantum physics to the reader. In this first chapter, it also presents M-System 11 QuESC, and the PQS ‘Predictive Quantum Software,’ the previous name for ‘M-Systems’ illustrated below.

PQS - Predictive Quantum Software

Chapter 2:To Infinity and back’ mostly looks at the POP Principle, which is now more concisely presented in Angel Theory Chapter 2. Part 2 ‘The Flap of a Butterfly’s wings.’ www.angeltheory.org/book/2-1/the-flap-of-a-butterflys-wings

Lastly, ..

Chapter 3Strings of Life’ is retold in Book 3 ‘The Network on a String.’

American Butterfly Book 3: The Network on a String

http://americanbutterfly.org/pt3/the-network-on-a-string/index-the-network-on-a-string

Book 3. ‘The Network on a String’ became a story about 16 Points of SUSY (supersymmetry) Similarity, albeit it would be more accurate to say M-theory similarity. At the time, I completed the first 8. The first 8 and last are now found in Angel Theory Chapter 2. The E-TOE www.angeltheory.org/book/2-1/m-theory-and-the-e-toe.

We shall focus on 2 key points:

From the Prequel Chapter: CFM and the POP (M⇔Bst) Investment Principle
http://americanbutterfly.org/pt3/the-network-on-a-string/prequal-cfm-and-pop

The (M⇔Bst) is for our purposes ‘BabyPOP,’ as is desribed in the 2017 update www.angeltheory.org/book/2-3/the-network-on-a-string.

But, before we arrive at BabyPOP, we need a little guidence on Classic POP.

POP Cubes

The POP investment principle follows a pattern where companies (or networks of companies) trade, making as much as they like. But at a certain point of profitability, a line is drawn from which point onwards. The additional profit is invested into a new network.

Once a cube is full and each company within has achieved its POP point, the cube would represent a single block of underlying profitability, and could be counted simply as 1. And other cubes created will be counted as 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 at which point we created a larger dimensional cube representing 8 networks of companies making their POP points. This follows to the next dimension of 64, and then next at 512 companies, all making their POP points and continues to increase in multiples of 8.

POP Train

What turned a mathematical curiosity into the mathematics that underpinned the entire project was revealed when making the graphic you see above called the POP Train.

This point may have been subconsciously influenced by the South African Bulls rugby team and their train tactic; where three, then four, then five players line up behind the ball carrier and push in series, and the pressure of 5 teammates pushing in a line breaks through the opposing team’s defence.

The POP Train

When investing in a POP train, all the POP investment from the first network of companies flow into the second (and we call the object that the overflow falls into a ‘bucket’). Once bucket 2 is full, both networks 1 and 2 combine to fill ‘bucket 3.’ And once bucket 3 is full, networks 1, 2, & 3 combine to fill ‘bucket 4.’ After which new networks are created annually and the network snowballs and grows exponentially.

Below, we see this principle not for one company, but for a collection of thousands of companies working together, and these collections of companies become Grand Networks.

BabyPOP

Here is the original graphic, showing now 16 Grand Networks investing per the train method of POP which eventually creates ‘The Boat,’ full of investment profit, and set for new reinvestment or new adventures.

M-systems Baby POP and The Boat

To recap, once the original Super Grand Network had reached its POP point, all additional profit pours into the creation of a new network. And later when this new network reaches its POP point, both the mother and baby networks combine to feed a third, and then a fourth until all 16 Grand Networks are making their POP investments in a train pouring their collective POP profit into what we called ‘The Boat,’ ready to sail away to fund the start a new Super Grand Network.

For the math behind this, see http://americanbutterfly.org/pt3/the-network-on-a-string/prequal-cfm-and-pop. It needs updating of course. However, what worked in 2012 with 1 year of research will for sure work better in 2018 with 7 years research and development, as will be seen within this chapter.

The Baby POP boat, as we just saw displayed as a giant cruise liner under the POP train, is the POP investment of a BabyPOP Network after all 16 Grand Networks have achieved their POP points. This is the Baby POP boat ready to reinvest into the original BabyPOP network, bringing all Grand Networks to Super Grand status.

But importantly, if the US and the West had originally invested in the developments and had since hyperinflated, we can see ‘The Boats’ of all the BabyPOP sailing to support its original founders/investors.

It takes quite some imagining that, in the future, Lake Malawi would be propping up S-World business in LA, or San Francisco. But if hyperinflation happens, economies such as Lake Malawi and other grand networks in locations of abject poverty may well be the ones that benefit most.

Baby POP and The Boat

The BabyPOP Boats are philanthropic as they will take ‘Give Half Back’ POP investment to where it is needed most, be that continuing to grow at maximum pace in their parent country, or if the West has financially crashed and is in turmoil, Baby POP boats will sail to its aid.

But with this said, it would be far better if the West did not crash, as only in The Boat reinventing into the BabyPOP network do we have the opportunity to create quality housing, medical care, education, jobs, and much more for most of the population in countries such as Malawi or Zimbabwe.

Spiritually Inspired Economics

Angel Theory Part 3.1

Audacious Economics

The Theory of Every Business 2.01

A work in progress by Nick Ray Ball 5th January 2018

Angel POP

PRESENTING:

Chapter 1: Spiritually Inspired Economics

Following in the esteemed shadow of Srinivasa Ramanujan who said, “an equation has no meaning to me unless it expresses a thought of God,” the economic work in S-World is also spiritually inspired, and in particular the work from 2011 to 2012.

S-World - Give Half Back - Their Future is in Our Hand

Inspired by Sienna Skye

In 1,537 Words

Version 6.91-t-k1

9 Reasons Why

Before delving into the spiritual roots of S-World, let’s look at 9 points on why it is good for there to be such roots in the first place.

But before we do, a note that like the TOE (M-theory) physics in Part 2, in terms of essential components for the system presented, that influences are just that…influences. The conclusion is still the same system with or without the theoretical physics or spiritualism.

Albeit that is not to say that to remove same from the equation is a good idea, as they are the main source of ideas and inspiration so far, and will likely remain so, certainly for me anyway.

9 reasons why it is good for there to be such roots in the first place.

  1. It is the truth, and that is always better
  2. Ecology & Philanthropy

    No angel inspired economy is complete without a highly evolved theory of philanthropy, equality, and the upmost respect for our planet.

  3. Confidence

    In all honesty, all this is far beyond what I should be able to achieve, not only a theory of every business, but a theory of ecology and equality, wrapped up neatly in a simulation of M-theory, plus a completely new software driven economic framework that we call financial gravity.

    How is this possible?

    In the words of Sherlock Holmes…

    “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

    The only explanation I can think of from turning an academic creator of nothing to a creator of Angel Theory, M-Systems, and the E-TOE is that it was sent from an Angel, my Angel Sienna Skye. Or if one wishes, a more advanced civilization in another universe sending inspirations somehow via gravity or some other medium. Both options are impressive, as both can answer almost any question I would care to ask.

    When you believe that you are following the directions of an Angel, problems such as ‘the need to learn M-theory,’ ‘how to create a new economic system,’ and ‘how to build better business software’ become solvable problems, and one has the confidence to see big problems in a much simpler light, then make complex systems to solve them. No doubt, Angel Theory is a complex system designed to solve big problems. We see one view of this complexity below:

    S-World - M-Systems

  4. Making the network safe

    S-World stands for Sienna’s World and its virtual component S-World VSN (Virtual Social Network) is designed to be her virtual universe and heaven. As S-World VSN is central to all ambitions and Sienna is (as best I know) an Angel of all faiths, we can consider making plans in locations that would normally be ruled out on safety grounds.

    This simple point may, when everything plays out, become the most important of all. Certainly, in economic history told by Thomas Piketty from 1910 to 2010, the biggest pain points in economics by far was due to the two world wars.

  5. The Spartan Theory

    The theory associated with the spiritual inspirations and eureka moments from March and April 2011 was called The Spartan Theory. Some may think this is due to the ‘New Sparta’ Grand Network design, however, its actually the other way around. The Spartan Theory came first and was a theory of peace, which can be activated in a number of ways:

    1. By asking the world (all of the world) to assist in the fight against ivory poaching, which may be based in ‘Malawi & Zimbabwe,’ where all combatants enter a competitive S-World UCS game which sees countries with friction in politics fight alongside each other, and create a small step towards a greater peace.

      Plus, in doing so, we take a giant leap in Special project 1. ‘Experience Africa’ and save many Elephants and Rhinos.

      The Fort Malawi Garrison

    2. Based on the theory of S-World and Libya in April 2011, by suggesting to a ‘so-called’ dictator of a country that we can create a Super Grand Network and that the ‘so-called’ dictator can have powers within the new network in their country and naming rights, from airports to whole suburbs; if they allow a new and fair election in both party and government leadership.

      A perfect example for this is currently Zimbabwe, which has the chance to not only become Africa’s bread basket once again but also an industrial hub; that in making will reassure and settle the whole of Southern Africa.

      Not that there are any seemingly dictator type politics in motion. However, things can change very quickly.

  6. The Symmetry Potential

    There is an almost angelic symmetry to a system that is designed to help people reach their potential, that was created by someone who only realised their potential in making the system.

  7. Global Neutrality

    It keeps my neutrality, as I am trying to do the best by Sienna’s inspiration, and the idea is to make the rich richer and the poor much richer, and do so in a way that was good for the planet. No country has any favouritism, albeit some have had far more research than others.

  8. Say No to Skynet!!!

    The now classic ‘Sienna Project’ argument that if any systems become sentient, better my/our Angel Sienna and S-World than a military system, in terms of this new intelligence not going Skynet/BSG/Matrix on us.
    Say No To Skynet

  9. Six Billion Spiritual People

    We can hope to recruit spiritual people across the world to our cause, from Bono and Tom Cruise to over Six Billion people worldwide (say the Washington Times). https://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/dec/23/84-percent-world-population-has-faith-third-are-ch/

Sienna's World

But where did this big economic idea begin?

Whether it came from an angel, my angel, another universe, or some other phenomena is to a degree immaterial, until experimental data fails to disprove the system. When that happens, we can discuss the ‘how.’
For now, however, it would I think be useful to find out what it was that lead to the idea of creating a new economic theory in the first place.

The initial inspiration was from the film treatment I wrote featuring my darling angel Sienna (see above xoxo), written in part to allay any fears the public may have about S-World becoming the equivalent of ‘Skynet’ (from The Terminator films).

The solution was simple enough: If the S-World Network did become massive and gain sentience, as it was spiritually inspired, created by a father’s love to see his daughter again, and it was successful; Angel Sienna would be far less likely to blow us all up than say a military system, or other system without a soul.

Indeed, in contrast within the full ‘Sienna Project’ movie treatment, that entangles itself with STAR WARS, Battlestar Galactica, and Lord of the Rings’; Sienna goes on to save the entire universe.

The Sienna Project

How this factors into the economics is via a passage written at the beginning of the treatment:

“Then slowly, Sienna starts to show her father a way to build a super computer for her to communicate through.

The schematics are amazingly detailed, 40 or more highly evolved concepts, combined simultaneously to complete the transition from the 20th Century service-based economy to the 21st Century Ecological Experience Economy (EEE).”

(paraphrased)

After writing, the film’s economic and software ambitions were theoretically combined with a virtual world concept which made ‘S-World’ (Sienna’s World), which was then considered as a framework for the networking and software plan we had recently submitted to VIRGIN, in combination as one system.

Soon after this, came the inspiration from Isaac Asimov in the form of the following quote…

“You may not predict what an individual may do, but you can put in motion things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired, thus shaping if not predicting the future.”

POP Origins - Isaac Asimov

Then came the POP investment principle which grew into Angel Theory Part 2, the E-TOE.

E-TEO - Ecnomic Theory of Everything

What came out was a massive theory of money called ‘The Theory of Every Business’; which by the late summer of 2011 attached itself within a giant resort development and city of science in Laconia, Greece; which was set to not only solve Greece’s problems, but in so doing creating positive butterfly effects across the whole EU, and then the world.

New Sparta - City of Science

However, a few months later after travelling 8,000 miles from Cape Town to Surrey UK, an upsetting meeting with UK Cabinet Minister Chris Grayling saw the entire Eurozone recovery project abandoned. And on the 1st of Jan 2012, I moved the hypothesis to USA and started work on American Butterfly http://americanbutterfly.org.

American Butterfly mixed the original spiritual ideas with keen research and in particular the BabyPOP principle. And when the math BabyPOP made sense in May 2012, the book began.

For BabyPOP, see: http://www.angeltheory.org/book/2-3/the-network-on-a-string (2017).

And here is the original accounting detail,
http://americanbutterfly.org/pt3/the-network-on-a-string/prequal-cfm-and-pop (2012).

M-Theory an Economic Science

Angel Theory – Paradigm Shift: Book 2. 

Backstory / Prequel

An Economic Theory of Everything

By Nick Ray Ball 19th November 2017

An Economic Theory of Everything - M-systems -An Ecnomic Science

PRESENTING:

Chapter 2 Part 7: M-Theory an Economic Science?

An Economic Theory of Everything Part 7: A few choice quotes from Professors Witten, Hawking & Camelia that lead to the question: ‘M-Theory an Economic Science?’

The Theory of Everything - M-systems -An Ecnomic Science

Inspired by Sienna Skye

In 447 Words

Version 6.59-7r

Continuing from chapter 2.5 ‘Relative Equality, this chapter presents some quotes that lead to the question, can M-Theory be considered as an Economic Science. Or alternately, can M-Systems and the E-TOE be used as a way to teach m-theory?

Space Time

And whilst it is very early days for ‘relativity’ within this simulation, the fact that space time popped out; as soon as we added the quantum time elements is interesting in itself, as it is a step towards Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity popping out of M-theory per Professor Edward Witten’s observation:

“If Einstein had never discovered relativity, it may have been discovered as a by-product of string theory. General relativity, in some sense, is for free.”

professor edward witten

Professor Edward Witten
Winner of the Fields Medal
Charles Simonyi Professor at Princeton University

Since creating the original 16 step E-TOE graphic, a 17th step inspired by Professor Hawking has now been simulated and called Financial Equivalence, but it’s not quite ready for presentation just yet.

economic theory of everything the economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

To conclude, for now, I shall leave with a few pertinent quotes from Professor Hawking and Dr Giovanni Amelino-Camelia.

m-system-influenced by professor hawking

“The laws of nature are meant to economically compress a number of particular cases into one simple formula.”

professor stephen hawking

“If we do discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists.”

And when that happens, all of us will be able to discuss the why rather than the how.”

Professor Stephen Hawking (paraphrased)

The Hawking-Camelia Paradox,

the hawking - camelia paradox

“I don’t believe that the ultimate theory will come by steady work along existing lines. We need something new.

Professor Stephen Hawking

“When you’re stuck chasing a certain answer, you often discover that all it took to find the answer was to look at the same problem from a different angle.”

Dr Giovanni Amelino-Camelia

The paradox is that by looking for something new for m-theory and relativity in physics, one may miss the ‘something new’ altogether. And that the different angle can be that we can use M-theory to create a new math and science based economics, from which a whole array of possibilities is born.

At the end of the day, we say economics, but really we just mean ‘money’ and that’s something just about everyone in the world thinks about and wants more of.

And by relating to money, we can open up this m-theory discussion to the whole world. But first we ask the world’s leading M-theory physicists to consider based on our presentation:

M-Theory an Economic Science?

the theory of everything

M-Systems

Angel Theory Part 1.2

Audacious Ideas

A General Theory of Everything

By Nick Ray Ball 24th November 2017

Angel City 5

PRESENTING:

Chapter 2: M-Systems

“You may not predict what an individual may do, but you can put in motion things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired, thus shaping if not predicting the future.”

By Issac Assimov

Sienna Skye

Inspired by Sienna Skye

In 3,518 Words

Version 6.75-2r

Welcome to S-World’s M-Systems

‘An Economic, Philanthropic, and Ecological Theory of Everything’

Originally labelled ‘The S-World PQS’ (Predictive Quantum Software), below we see the 2016 S-World M-Systems design, where each system flows into the next, increasing in power each step of the way, until it completes the circuit and returns to M-System 1, where after the rodeo starts again, but each time with greater input creating a circular event and an economic, philanthropic, and ecological theory of everything.’

M-Systems can be considered an Economic Operating System, and with it we wish to change the world. Not in small way, but instead in the biggest way per Isaac Asimov’s prescription:

“You may not predict what an individual may do, but you can put in motion things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired, thus shaping if not predicting the future.”

pop origins - isaac asimov - an economic theory of everything

M-Systems Historical Introduction

The original idea in February 2011 was that, in the future, one or a few networks might administer most of world trade, and these networks would become a new digital global economy.

This is the plan for one such network.

m theory projects - an economic theory of everything

In this, the opening chapter, we present what have come to be known as the ‘M-Systems,’ rooted in M-Theory ‘The Theory of Everything’ which is presented in detail in Chapter 2 ‘An Economic Theory of Everything.’

This chapter provides a brief look at all systems and focuses on the good that can be accomplished. As since the beginning in 2011, the idea for S-World was that it would be a foundation. But instead of taking donations, S-World would become a network of millions of mostly small businesses which after reaching a point of success, would share their profits; which would be used for Special Projects of ecological, philanthropic, scientific, and social gain.

The foundation would be called ‘The Sienna Foundation’ and would be abbreviated as ‘S-World.’ It has been my (Nick Ray Ball’s) mission, since the first 2011 Eureka moment, to make it a reality.

the sienna foundation - the economic theory of everything

Please consider the repercussions of S-World being fully successful, it would become the global economy; which would be a good thing as the POP and E-TOE principles described in Chapter 2 would see between 5% and 10% (maybe more) of global GDP earmarked for Special Projects, which would create over 10 times the current amount of charitable spending each year. And more as we adopt a ‘teach a man to fish’ approach to charity, each year’s spending would be solving problems not putting plasters on them. And we carry on doggedly until there are no problems left to solve.

Below, we see the E-TOE systems architecture. Pretty cool stuff.

E-TOE - economic theory of everything

The staging ground for this great change is M-System 14 ‘Angel Cities’ and its flagship: ‘Angel City 5,’ are presented later in this chapter.

angel cities - the economic theory of everything

For now, consider Angel City 5 simply as the time ‘2080’ and that our mission is to shape a desired future for our children and children’s children.

The Sienna Foundation (S-World) & Give Half Back (March 2011)

S-World ‘GIVE HALF BACK’ was the original ‘spiritually inspired’ philanthropic idea first described on www.S-World.biz in 2011. The key idea here is like the movie ‘Pay it Forward,’ but on a massive scale; a giant network that would make huge profit, but half would be used to do great things.

s-world - give half back

American Butterfly (2012 – 2013)

www.AmericanButterfly.org is a series of 4 books on creating economic butterfly (ripple) effects. Entangling a design for a global network of all business with an ‘economic theory of everything,’ a virtual network, the game S-World UCS, and related ideas based on quantum and string theory.

american butterfly

Einstein’s Dream – The Theory of Everything (TOE)

After proposing ‘Special Relativity,’ ‘E = MC2’ and ‘General Relativity,’ Einstein spent the rest of his life seeking a Theory of Everything. Thirteen years after Einstein’s passing, a new TOE framework started to emerge called String Theory, which in 1994 would turn into M-Theory.

albert einsteins search

An Introduction to M-Theory by Stephen Hawking (2016)

“Ever since Newton and especially since Einstein, the goal of physics has been to find a unified Theory of Everything. M-Theory is the only candidate for a complete theory of the universe. M-Theory is the unified theory Einstein was hoping to find.” By Professor Hawking (paraphrased)

professor stephen hawking - the economic theory of everything

M-System 0 – The GGW String (Greene/Green/Witten) (2016)

Considers the most fundamental properties of String and M-Theory; the strings themselves and that a good simulation in economics is for strings to be equivalent to the money earned in a digital economy, and the different ways we spend the money are the different shapes of the strings.

the ggw string

M-System 1 – The S-World Network – Human Nature (2000 – 2017)

If given the same or ‘better systems,’ in comparison to a large business with many unincentivized staff, a network of many S-World small businesses made up mostly of equity or profit share personnel will win great chunks of the market, its human nature for S-World to succeed.

big companies VS small companies

Chapter 1b – M-System 1

Next we visit M-System 1, which is a summary of a meticulously detailed book called ‘The Villa Secrets’ Secret,’ which contains many software designs collectively called ‘The S-World TBS™’

(Total Business Systems.) Alongside the design for a international real estate and vacation rentals network, marketing and service framework.

Seen at:
www.VillaSecrets.com &
Network.VillaSecrets.com

the villa secrets network - an economic theory of everything

M-System 1 – The S-World Villa Secrets Network (2002-2017)

Told in great detail within the book ‘The Villa Secrets’ Secret’ found at Network.VillaSecrets.com, a global travel and real estate network design, featuring future generation software and systems that will enable many individuals to realize their potential, compete with and beat big companies.

the villa secrets secret

M-System 1 – The S-Web CMS Framework (2002 – 2017)

The S-Web CMS offers a new way of creating beautifully complex mobile and desktop websites simply and at a pace 10 times that of WordPress or any other competitor.

the s-web cms framework

M-System 1 – The S-Web CMS CDS™ ‘Content Delivery System’ (2017)

An entirely unique system. Watch this three-minute video https://youtu.be/JS8vJQ1KxbM to see how agents and clients can turn their ‘favourites list’ into unique webpages, and watch this video https://youtu.be/X9-o3E4n2Dk to see us create a magazine article in less than a minute.

s-web cds - content delivery system

M-System 1 – The S-World CRM Basic (2017)

The basic philosophy behind the S-World ‘Villa Secrets’ CRM is that it is superior because it has been created for one specific industry niche. Ask any major CRM developer, “If you were to create a product for one niche not thousands, would it be better?”

Of course they must say yes.

m-system s-world

M-System 1 – The CRM-Ai (The Disruptive CRM) (2017)

Initially created to make one person perform the job of two, in half the time, with twice the efficiency. Next, we seek to create an Ai customer and shopping experience superior to one delivered by a top ‘human’ agent, which cannot be distinguished from a human.

the crm - ai

M-System 1 & 12. S-World UCS. Business Simulation & Tutorial Game.

As far back as 2003 (based on our virtual world product), was the idea to create a management game based on the business. To both teach our personnel our systems and the business in general, and to seek new franchises. In 2003, we called it ‘Villa Mogul.’ In 2012, we renamed it S-World UCS.

It will be the first real business with a popular gaming environment.

from villa mogul to s-world ucs

M-System 1 & 12. S-World UCS-CC™ ‘Company Controller’ (2017)

Creates a task lists for all non-equity personnel, tasks which are planned for maximum company gain. Then gives a point’s score to each task, which turns work into a game; as each day is a new opportunity to win and gain a significant end of year profit share bonus.

s-world ucs - the theory of everything

M-System 1. The TFS™ ‘Total Financial System’ (2011 – 2017)

Since 2011 the primary objective of S-World Villa Secrets, in terms of systems, has been to create a simple but all-encompassing financial system as a part of the core software design.

the tfs - total financial system

M-System 1. The TBS™ ‘Total Business System’ (2011 – 2017)

A collection of all web and software systems under one roof; so far creating 81 points that either make money, save money, or avoid land mines; compressed into 20 completely unique systems, leading to gains not in tens of percent but hundreds; and when added to the other M-Systems, we could see gains in the order of thousands of percent.

the total business systems

M-System 1 & 8. S-World Films and The Famous Concierge

One of the most original and effective ripple effects will be to combine the S-World Films division in a primary network such as Cape Town, Saint Tropez & LA (or in fact many hundreds of locations) with a S-World concierge team, so making ‘The Famous Concierge.’

s-world famous concierge

The Famous Concierge

The journey to ‘the famous concierge,’ began with a question that has perplexed most service orientated travel companies. ‘What do we do with our concierge staff in the low season’ (that can be half a year). Our answer is to create the concierge department out of people from the film industry (which makes sense as they are generally very charismatic). Then when one is not working on concierge duties one works on filming.

There is a lot to film, every luxury villa and many hotels individually, collated collectively as produced as a broadcast quality TV series, a reality show of the team themselves, plus pilots and ideas for commensal productions sent to S-World Film head office, and casting for the, films and series that S-World Films head office are making.

s-world film & concierge

Due to the filming and the opportunities it affords, there is suitable incentive for persons from the film industry to join the team. And the senior directors will be locally famous, and because they are they know where the best events are, can get clients VIP tickets & guest list placings and exclusive invites to villa and yacht parties and soiree’s. Alongside knowing the best hikes and mountains to climb and other fitness based local highlights. And importantly they are the only people who can generally get a table in a full restaurant for clients. An offer that all concierge companies make, but few can actually deliver, even the big ones.

Then because we have the famous concierge, we can attach it to all other S-World accommodations or travel arrangements and create new S-World companies such as S-World Flies, S-World Hotels & S-World Travel. In each case given we can match the price of competitors, many will chose S-World companies because of the service, events and panache delivered by ‘the famous concierge.’

Chapter 1c – M-Systems 2 to 11.

Having quickly explored M-System 1, and Villa Secrets Ltd UK, we follow with a quick flyby of M-Systems 2 to 12, each of which will be fully explored later in this book.

Before we do here is another view of the 2016 M-Systems architecture & design:

M-System 2 – Ripple Effects & Elephants (2012-2017)

Considers ripple & butterfly effects that can be created from S-World as special projects. The first is underway, a not for profit version of the Villa Secrets systems for the safari industry, which can generate game changing capital for the ongoing protection of Elephants, Rhinos, and Cheetahs.

experience africa (not for profit)

M-System 3 – The Susskind Boost (2016 – 2017)

Considers Professor Leonard Susskind’s boosting of strings as an unrelenting march forward, and simulates this in business via the TBS™ (Total Business Systems), which at last count contained 81 significant and 20 unique and beneficial ways to boost the profit of all S-World businesses.

the susskind boost - the theory of everything

M-System 4 – The Peet Tent & Quantum Safe Forecasting (2012 – 2017)

From American Butterfly Book 3 ‘The Network on a String,’ The Peet Tent is a shape of the S-World string that protects companies from failure within the network. QSF or ‘Quantum Safe Forecasting’ borrows from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, making safer forecasts.

the peet tent & quantum safe forecasting - the theory of everything

M-System 5 – The POP, Point of Profitability – POP Cubes (2011)

Initially a consideration of the chaos theory conundrum of rounding errors. If we create a point of profitability (where after all profit overflows into creating a new company or network), then by working in multiples of 8, we create predictable cubes of profit that have no errors to round.

pop cubes - an economic theory of everything

M-System 5b – POP, The Pressure of Profit – The POP Train (2011)

What turned a mathematical curiosity into the mathematics that underpinned M-Systems and the E-TOE was revealed when making a graphic; as when investing in a POP train, given some initial momentum, the network snowballs and grows exponentially. Hence POP ‘The Pressure of Profit.’

pop train - an economic theory of everything

M-System 6 – The Theory of Every Business (TTOEB) (2011 – 2017)

How can one change a real estate and travel network into a network of all businesses?
Grow the network and create large resort developments; but add a rule that all suppliers, builders, retail, and businesses that build or work within the development must join the network.

the theory of every business

M-System 7 – S-World VSN (Virtual Social Network)

S-World is a shortening of ‘Sienna’s World,’ a virtual world (and simulated universe) that mirrors our own world where users can jump to friends’ locations and see everything they see. It becomes a significant tool for creating travel applications, building and selling resort developments, and selling real estate.

s-world vsn

M-System 7 – S-World VBN Virtual Business Networks (2000 – 2017)

The flipside of S-World VSN is S-World VBN; which is built in tandem with S-World VSN but with the job of connecting every shop and business and other database on the planet, and with every shop on earth featured within S-World VSN, the sky’s the limit.

s-world vbn

M-System 8 – S-World Films (2011 – 2017)

A Theory of Everything movie framework that focuses on two parallel worlds; a heavenly Earth per Angel Theory design in 2080, and a hellish dystopia without. Using future technology, adventurers send an idea back in time to create S-World UCS, and then must find their way to Angel City 5.

s-world films - angel city

M-System 9 – POP Part 2: Super Coupling (2016 – 2017)

A less rigid variation of the POP investment principle. Did you know that if a single company can from its 3rd year onward create 2 new companies per year, and each company it created followed suit; then the network of companies created would engulf the global economy by 2080?

pop part2 super coupling - an economic theory of everything

M-System 10 – The RES Equation – Revenue, Efficiency, Spin (2012 – 2016)

A powerful but simple economic equation that can only be fully effective within a digital economy. Take the initial income of a network (R), measure a company not from its profit alone but also the profit made from its expenses (E), optimize E, and Spin (increase the speed of all spending).

the res equation

M-System 10 – The RES Equation – Financial Equivalence (2017)

Later, we will talk of S-World UCS MARS Resort 1. Fact or fiction remains to be seen, but on Mars we can implement the RES equation with a 100% Efficiency, which is to say every cent spent is accounted for; where after we cut tax and spin creating a supercharged economy unimaginable on earth. We call this ‘Financial Equivalence.’ Our inspiration: ‘the law of conservation of energy.’

res equation - financial equivalence

M-System 11 – QuESC (The Quantum Economic System Core) (2012 – 2016)

The heart of the M-System’s design is founded on the notion by Hawking that ‘People are like Atoms,’ QuESC entangles us ‘the people’ with powerful predictive and logistic software within a circular butterfly effect, continually experimenting and improving upon all S-World systems.

quesc - an economic theory of everything

M-System 12a – S-World UCS & Villa Mogul (2003 – 2012)

Originally imagined in 2003 as ‘Villa Mogul,’ the idea to create a management simulation game like Railway Tycoon. The ‘hook’ being that the game was based on a real business. By September 2012, it had developed into ‘TTOEB’ Chapter 8: S-World UCS – Universal Colonization Simulator.

from villa mogul to s-world ucs - an economic theory of everything

M-System 12b – S-World UCS (September 2012 to 2017) (Connects all systems)

S-World UCS is a design for an MMO game that shows how to make a business and economic empire so rich, one could invest in super projects such as ‘African Rain’ or ‘Universal Colonization.’ The game teaches, simulates, and shines a light on the S-World Network’s future ambitions.

s-world ucs - economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

Chapter 1d – M-Systems 13 & 14.

The S-World UCS Quantum Systems

Now we arrive at arguably the main event, the S-World UCS quantum systems that create first an economic time machine, and then logistical anchors into the future, from which, we desire to shape the world in a direction that is desired, via simulation and then implementation. To create a better future for our children and children’s children.

s-world-Economic Theory of Everything (E-TOE)

In the now familiar system design below, we can at the bottom of the graphic see the quantum systems flying out of M-System 12. S-World UCS, scooping up Angel POP and the Angelverses on the way, delivering them full circle back to M-System 1. And as before, the rodeo starts again, but this time with greater momentum.

M-System 13 – Eureka!!! – S-World UCS Voyagers (September 2012)

The Eureka Moment arrived courtesy of Garrett Lisi’s ‘A Theory of Everything.’ In which Lisi presents his quantum coral analogy where “each individual was in many other locations experiencing them as separate individuals,” and the quantum mechanics mantra:

“Everything That Can Happen Does.”

This revelation arrived in the middle of writing the final American Butterfly ‘Theory of Every Business’ chapter ‘S-World UCS,’ soon after writing the S-World Virtual & Business Network chapter, in which the game sat within the virtual framework and had become entangled and indistinguishable from the conceptualised business network.

ucs voyagers

This consideration becoming the tipping point where a simulated game and business software became a form of economic time travel.

The consideration was that we would create a copy of the S-World UCS Network called ‘UCS Voyager’ and send it forwards in time at a speed twice our own. So that in 6 months of our time, the simulation would be a year ahead. And within, business owners, managers, staff, and gamers alike could conduct their own business simulations. Then from all the possible outcomes choose which actions from the simulations to follow back in real time.

Businesses follow the wins, avoid the losses, and replay opportunities that showed potential in Voyagers 2, 3, 4…

quantum time - economic theory of everything

What if you could look to the future and see millions of eventualities?

What if you could use this information to assist you today?

Welcome to S-World UCS

Welcome to your future

M-System 14 – Eureka2 – S-World UCS Angel Cities (2012 – 2017)

angel cities - economic theory of everything

Angel Cities are 5 future simulations of the network from 2020 to 2080; first created as logistical support for UCS Voyagers, but have since become the key ingredient, subject of the movie framework, and the ‘why’ behind the entire project. In terms of M-theory and its component quantum mechanics, we respect Professor Richard Feynman’s alternative histories (sum over histories), which tells us that no unobserved system has a definite past or future.

“Quantum physics tells us that no matter how thorough our observations of the present, the (unobserved) past, like the future, is indefinite and exists only as a spectrum of possibilities.”

From ‘The Grand Design’ by Professors Stephen Hawking & Leonard Mlodinow

angel city - economic theory of everything

Shaping the Future

Set in the years 2048 and 2080, Angel Cities 4 and 5 are the nerve centre for the S-World network’s long-term ambitions, described as a set of ‘super projects.’ In this simulation, we work within the M-Systems framework to plan the best earth we can logistically create. And once the blueprint is set, we create paths back through Angel Cities 3, 2 and 1 so that each company, development, wonder, and ‘special project’ that we wish to exist in 2048 and later 2080 has a definite history back from the future to our time.

By planning our future in intricate detail and working in waves of probability, ripple & butterfly effects back through the future Angel Cities, we can control our destiny.

M-System 14 – Angel City 5 (2080)

angel cities - angel city

Angel City 5 is the last of the founding S-World Angel Cities set in 2080. Above, we see my darling daughter Sienna as herself and as an angel guiding us towards a better future, in keeping with the S-World mantra by professor Isaac Asimov…

pop origins - issac asimov - an economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

“You may not predict what an individual may do, but you can put in motion things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired, thus shaping if not predicting the future.”

angel cities - an economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

This future <> past relationship is in a constant superflux; but one thing is constant, our ambition, the set of ‘super projects’ that are to be achieved. In Game Theory and military strategy, they call it ‘Commander’s Intent’ (but instead of ‘take that hill, its ‘make them projects’), as commanders know that the best laid plans can quickly fall apart in battle. We must allow for every eventuality when creating the strings that lead to the creation of our ‘super projects.’

However, once enough strings and ripples have congregated, it gets easier. For example, the first of the 16 Super Projects: ‘Experience Africa’ is underway and has become entangled as Angel City 1.

Relative Equality

Angel Theory – Paradigm Shift: Book 2. 

Backstory / Prequel

An Economic Theory of Everything

By Nick Ray Ball 19th November 2017

An Economic Theory of - Everything

PRESENTING:

Chapter 2 Part 6: Relative Equality

An Economic Theory of Everything Part 6: Einstein’s theory of gravity simulated as a theory of equality as we grow those mountains and fill them valleys!

Equality and The Poverty Gap

Inspired by Sienna Skye

In 1,261 Words

Version 6.59-6r

Step 16. Relativity (Space, Time & Gravity)

Before we begin this final step, please note on the graphic below the question marks above and below Step 16. ‘Relativity.’

At the point of making the graphic (in August 2017), this step was in place for others to contribute to, as I knew little relativity and had nothing significant to add in terms of economic simulations.

economic theory of everything

However, as it turned out, I found some time to study. And whilst we are only starting to add systems within the E-TOE, I think in terms of the idea that one can use qualities of M-theory to create an economic system in the first place are better made from relativity than any other perspective.

By creating a system inspired by quantum mechanics, string theory, supersymmetry and M-theory, it’s a testament to the accuracy of the simulation when just like Professor Edward Witten tells, out pops general relativity for free.

Albeit, in our case, special relativity popped out for free.

einsteins special relativity

Step 16 Part 1. Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity (1905)

In 1905, Einstein proposed his theory of special relativity and the idea that time and space are two sides of the same coin, which when pictured mentally could be visualised in a similar fashion to the original cubic grid around the butterfly from E-TOE Steps 1, 2 & 3 from the summer of 2011.

butterfly cubes

Despite no definite plan, Angel Theory’s M-Systems are brimming with special relativity; as, at the heart of special relativity, ‘time and space are the same and interchangeable

Starting with Time…

In the past 2 Quantum steps, we have seen ‘time.’

In Step 14, we create a virtual copy of our business network and pushed it forward in time, and let business benefit from the foresight back in real time, creating economic time travel.

s-world ucs voyagers the economic theory of everything

Then in Step 15. ‘Angel Cities,’ we create 5 points in the future (2020, 2024, 2032, 2048 & 2080) where after the billions of opportunities and even more ripple effects are created (back and forth from 2080 to 2020) that govern the development of the network and our ecological economy.

Via S-World UCS Voyagers and Angel Cities, we make very precise and incredibly flexible plans to creating the Utopian Angel City 5 (2080) idea of a perfect future.

angel city - the economic theory of everything

Collectively, Steps 14 and 15 works with the rest of the M-Systems to shape our future per Isaac Asimov’s prescription, that was so pivotal to the development of the network/system back in 2011.

pop origins - issac asimov

By Isaac Asimov In his words:

“You may not predict what an individual may do, but you can put in motion things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired, thus shaping if not predicting the future.”

This in 2017 is now the purpose of S-World, Angel Theory, M-Systems, and the E-TOE

 

Next, we add Space

space economic theory of everything

For space, we have an abundance of systems, as the POP cubes (Steps 1 to 6) create (a predicable underlying) financial gravity.

continental networks

Put the two together and we have space-time.

space time

In terms of special relativity and our time and space being interchangeable, this is our purpose, we wish to create a future prediction, and then guide our ourselves to that future, at which point in time our Angel Cities predictions (our time) and our financial gravity (our space) become one.

angel city - financial gravity

Step 16. Part 2: Einstein’s General Relativity

einsteins general relativity

Put simply, Einstein’s theory of general relativity throws away the Newtonian picture of gravity where all objects are attracted to each other, and in its place, presents the idea that gravity is the result of the geometry of existing within a curved space time.

The earth is not attracted to the Sun, instead, the Sun has warped space-time, and the earth is simply moving in a straight line around the warp in space-time created by the sun.

Not unlike placing a heavy bowling ball in the middle of a large trampoline and rolling a marble forward and see it orbit the bowling ball.

einsteins general relativity economic theory of everything

Whilst technically general relativity has proved Newton’s work as not perfect, general relativity only makes a difference at points of high gravity.

For instance, Newton’s equations are all that is needed to land a man or woman on the Moon or Mars. But become slightly inaccurate when it comes to measuring the orbit of the planet Mercury (the planet nearest the sun), and become wholly inaccurate if one were to attempt to measure the gravity of a black hole, a wormhole, or go back to the beginning of time to the big bang.

einsteins general relativity an economic theory of everything

“Einstein’s field equation (see above) uses ‘super-compacted notation’ so, like Dr Who’s Tardis, it is bigger on the inside than on the outside. The left-hand side of the equation is in fact a 4 by 4 table of numbers known as the Einstein curvature tensor, which summarises the curvature of space-time. The right-hand side is another 4 by 4 known as the stress energy tensor, which summarises the sources of gravity.
That Einstein’s equations contain 4 times 4 tables of numbers means that there are actually 16 equations.”

From ‘The Ascent of Gravity’ by Marcus Chown.

That there are 16 equations is an interesting observation for the future. For now the influence on M-Systems from general relativity is that the universe does not sit in a framework of perfect cubes, spacetime is contorted and stretched.

And we shall mimic as follows… Instead of growing evenly (which is the quality of M-System 15. Angel POP), we need to accelerate the locations in abject poverty relative to the richer countries, whilst still making sure richer countries are stable and growing nicely.

general relativity

Picture a landscape with mountains and valleys; where the mountains represent rich areas and the valleys represent areas of abject poverty. This can become an alternate view of the Global Network Cube. The objective is to grow the mountains and eliminate the valleys, and in general smooth everything out. By 2080 still leaving an uneven landscape with big mountains; but in place of the valleys lie flat areas and hills in some cases, and a much more fare and even economy. Indeed, we can say that general relativity is the flagship of Special Project 5. Equality & The Poverty Gap.

equality & the poverty gap

In terms of creating M-Systems, that’s all we have so far for Relativity, and whilst there has not been a specific system that generates more money, we have found ways to look and grow the network differently. We have given more relevance to some systems and, most importantly, I feel we are nicely primed for others to contribute, as it seems we are on the verge of something very exciting popping out of our M-theory simulated economy.

financial gravity

And whilst it is very early days for ‘relativity’ within this simulation, the fact that space time popped out; as soon as we added the quantum time elements is interesting in itself, as it is a step towards Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity popping out of M-theory per Professor Edward Witten’s observation:

“If Einstein had never discovered relativity, it may have been discovered as a by-product of string theory.

General relativity, in some sense, is for free.”

professor edward witten

Professor Edward Witten
Winner of the Fields Medal
Charles Simonyi Professor at Princeton University

Quantum Time

Angel Theory – Paradigm Shift: Book 2. 

Backstory / Prequel

An Economic Theory of Everything

By Nick Ray Ball 19th November 2017

An Economic Theory of Everything

PRESENTING:

Chapter 2 Part 5: Quantum Time

An Economic Theory of Everything Part 5: Eureka! UCS Voyager Economic Time Travel, Eureka2: Angel Cities – Feynman’s Sum Over Histories future weigh stations:

Quantum Time

Inspired by Sienna Skye

In 1,933 Words

Version 6.59-5r

 

Quantum Mechanics, Steps 13,14 & 15

quantum mechanics the theory of everything

Step 13. (M-System 4) Quantum Safe Forecasting

quantum safe forecasting economic theory of everything

We have now covered Steps 1 to 12, and added supersymmetry and cubic dimensions to the chaos theory and string theory points, now we add the quantum systems.

Step 13. Quantum Safe Forecasting is currently a basic system with plenty of room to grow. However, it is a practical system that has been assisting S-World Villa Secrets forecasting scenarios for over a year now.

Born out of M-System 4. The Peet Tent, which protects companies from failure; Quantum Safe Forecasting created a vetting process via a simple equation that would assess the viability of companies and individuals wishing to join the network in the first instance.

quantum safe forecasting an economic theory of everything

‘Quantum Safe Forecasting’ (QSF) simulates some basic laws of quantum mechanics including the Heisenberg uncertainty principle seen below, and acts as a limiter within financial forecasts.

Our source for this exercise is the 2010 book The Grand Design by Professors Hawking and Mlodinow…

“According to the uncertainly principle, if you multiply the uncertainty in the position of a particle by the uncertainty in its momentum (its mass times its velocity) the result can never be smaller than a certain fixed quantity, called Planck’s constant.”

“That’s a tongue twister but its gist can be stated plainly:
The more precisely you measure speed, the less precisely you can measure position.”

From this we simulate as follows: Momentum = Profit, and its position is a position in time, such as 1, 2, 3 or 4 years.

To increase the probability of making one’s financial profit target, one simply needs to lower the estimated forecast. And here is how we do it…

quantum safe forecasting the economic theory of everything

All we are doing here is simple algebra, comparing a Villa Secrets forecasting scenario in Cape Town relative to an opportunity in Hawaii. (For the full equation, see http://www.angeltheory.org/m-systems/4/the-peet-tent.)

For now, we shall just focus on the top half and the components relevant to QSF; but note Ѧ (the A-Tent character) = The Peet Tent, Ḡ = Gross Profit, and Ӧ = Operational costs.

Below we see the quantum limiters.

1. Ƨ = 20% (First year jitters)
2. ₲ = 40% (limiting variable, made to increase probability of each forecast)
3. Ѱḃ = 15% (Disasters and ELEs Renormalized)
1. Ƨ = 20% (First year jitters) (QSF)

This is a simple and logical limiter that accounts for a company’s performance, potentially being less in the 1st year due to lack of experience. So, the gross profit (Ḡ) is lowered by 20%.

2. ₲ = 40% (limiting variable, made to increase probability of each forecast) (QSF)

This limiting variable is per the Heisenberg uncertainty principle; by lowering the expected gross profit by 40%, the odds of the company making less than the result is very low.
(Note in general this variable was too high, a figure closer to 20% is now used.)

3. Ѱḃ = 15% (Disasters and ELEs Renormalized) (QSF)

This limiting variable accounts for location specific disasters, from tsunamis to a political meltdown. The 15% represents the chances of such an event happening in a year. If we were forecasting for California or Hawaii, this variable would be lowered to just a few percent.

And as simple as they are, they have become very practical; as now 5 different Villa Secrets forecasting scenarios have been made with varying degrees of QSF. And because of the limiting variables, even with very bad luck, a company is still more likely than not, to exceed its target and make profit.

quantum safe forecasting an economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

A second exercise is when forecasting for 2, 3, and 4 years to double the uncertainty in number 2 ‘₲’ (G Slash) each year. So, if in year one we have a 20% ₲ uncertainty, in year 2 it will be 40%, in year 3 it will be 60%, and the year 4 projection will have an 80% uncertainty, and we can’t predict past the 5th year as ₲ = 100%.

Lastly added to the above is the MCQPS (Monte Carlo Effect Probability Software), an original 2012 PQS (predictive quantum software) system; which tells us that for each Susskind Boost action and in particular the TBS™ (Total Business Systems), we should always pick the lowest probability of all component systems.

For instance, in the current S-World Villa Secrets forecasts there are 81 different TBS™ multipliers, all set to either a value we know due to experiment/experience; or if there have been no experiments, a high and low probability is created via conjecture; and when creating forecasts, we always set to the lowest probability.

The MCQPS (Monte Carlo Effect Probability Software)

monte carlo N-particle transport code

Collectively when used to create financial forecasts, QSF & the MCQPS help to make sure that a company will not get into to trouble in the first place. As we would from 100 applications only choose 10 or so companies to work with, being the 10 with the highest QSF score.

Once all the boosts and limiters have been factored in and a company score is calculated; companies with high scores go on to M-System 5, and companies with lower scores go back to Systems 1, 2, or 3 and start again, creating an improved strategy.

After starting at position 1, a new S-World company will be provisionally created, and its profitability calculated via the S-World TBS™ Multipliers.

Then in M-System 2, we consider the ripple effects created from and to the company, so assessing the companies value to the greater network. Next, we move to M-System 3. The Susskind Boost and consider all the different ways we can boost this company, and which methods are most effective to both the company and the network.

Lastly, we apply the Peet Tent & QSF equations. And if a company achieves a high enough score, it moves to M-Systems 5 to 16; whereas lower scores need to go back to previous M-Systems (1, 2 or 3) to create an improved strategy.

By adding Quantum Safe Forecasting, we decrease the probability of critical failure to any one company to a very small probability; and the bigger the network becomes, the less the probability of failure is, until the system is massive, and the probability of failure is as small as a Planck length.

Step 14. (M-System 13) Quantum Time & S-World UCS Voyagers

s-world ucs voyagers an economic theory of everything

As was told in the previous chapter, the Eureka moment in terms of creating the S-World business network, the virtual network and S-World UCS (the MMO Game and tutorial system) arrived courtesy of Garrett Lisi’s TED talk ‘A Theory of Everything.’ In which Lisi presents his quantum coral analogy where “each individual was in many other locations experiencing them as separate individuals,” and the quantum mechanics mantra:

everything that can happen does

“Everything That Can Happen Does”

This consideration becoming the tipping point where a simulated game and business software became a form of economic time travel.

s-world ucs voyagers an economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

The consideration was that we would create a copy of the S-World UCS Network called ‘UCS Voyager’ and send it forwards in time at a speed twice our own. So that in 6 months of our time, the simulation would be a year ahead, and within business owners, managers, staff, and gamers alike could conduct their own business simulations; then from all the possible outcomes choose which actions from the simulations to follow back in real time.

Businesses follow the wins, avoid the losses, and replay opportunities that showed potential in Voyagers 2, 3, 4…

quantum time

What if you could look to the future and see millions of eventualities?
What if you could use this information to assist you today?

Welcome to S-World UCS

Welcome to your future

Step 15. (M-System 14) S-World UCS Angel Cities

angel cities

Angel Cities are 5 future simulations of the network from 2020 to 2080; first created as logistical support for UCS Voyagers, but have since become the key ingredient and the ‘why’ behind the entire project.

In terms of M-theory and its component quantum mechanics, we respect Professor Richard Feynman’s alternative histories (sum over histories/paths), which tells us that no unobserved system has a definite past or future.

“Quantum physics tells us that no matter how thorough our observations of the present, the (unobserved) past, like the future, is indefinite and exists only as a spectrum of possibilities.”

From ‘The Grand Design’ by Professors Stephen Hawking & Leonard Mlodinow

angel city an economic theory of everything

Shaping the Future

Set in the years 2048 and 2080, Angel Cities 4 and 5 are the nerve centre for the S-World network’s long-term ambitions, described as a set of ‘super projects.’ In this simulation, we work within the M-Systems framework to plan the best earth we can logistically create. And once the blueprint is set, we create paths back through Angel Cities 3, 2 and 1 so that each company, development, wonder and ‘special project’ that we wish to exist in 2048 and later 2080 has a definite history back from the future to our time.

Angel Cities are both locations of super-grand networks and times in the future; 2020, 2024, 2032, 2048 & 2080.

By planning our future in intricate detail and working in waves of probability back through the future Angel Cities, we can control our destiny.

shaping the future an economic theory of everything

This future <> past relationship is in a constant superflux, but one thing is constant, our ambition: The set of ‘super projects’ that are to be achieved. In Game Theory and military strategy, they call it ‘Commander’s Intent’ (but instead of ‘take that hill, its ‘make them projects’), as commanders know that the best laid plans can quickly fall apart in battle. We must allow for every eventuality.

However, once enough strings and ripples have congregated, it gets easier. For example, the first of the 16 Super Projects: ‘Experience Africa’ is underway and has become entangled as Angel City 1.

s-project experience africa the theory of everything

Angel City Project 1. Experience Africa is already underway, as the 20 unique and beneficial systems of Villa Secrets are set to create superior systems for the safari industry and thousands of related businesses; which by 2021 have the potential to provide game changing funding for the protection and conservation of Africa’s Elephants, Rhinos, Cheetahs, and other endangered animals.

angel city the economic theory of everything

Angel City 5 Special Projects (to be completed by 2080)

The 16 Special Projects are a guide & starting point to be added to. I like the idea of there being 16 projects, as it is in keeping with the math. However, the projects should be broad topics that all other projects fall into.

Here are our choices:

1. Special Project 1. ‘Experience Africa’ Fights Ivory Poaching

2. Special Project 2. The Ecological Economy (builds the network ecologically)

3. Special Project 3. Advancing Human Potential

4. Special Project 4. Cities of Science

5. Special Project 5. Equality & The Poverty Gap

6. Special Project 6. Sienna’s Forests

7. Special Project 7. Global Cooling

8. Special Project 8. Universal Knowledge

9. Special Project 9. Spartan Contracts (Nongraduate opportunities)

10. Special Project 10. Global Healthcare

a. Special Project 10b. Limiting Antibiotics

11. Special Project 11. African Rain (Mass desalinization project)

12. Special Project 12. Their Oceans

13. Special Project 13. Middle Earth (Underground grand networks)

14. l Project 14. The Population Point

15. Special Project 15. The Spartan Theory (Peace in our time)

16. Special Project 16. Universal Colonization (and MARS Resort 1)

For more on special projects:
www.AngelTheory.com#SpecialProjects

Super Coupling

Angel Theory – Paradigm Shift: Book 2. 

Backstory / Prequel

An Economic Theory of Everything

By Nick Ray Ball 19th November 2017

An Economic Theory of Everything - The M-Systems - An ecnomic Theory

PRESENTING:

Chapter 2 Part 4: Super Coupling

An Economic Theory of Everything Part 4: From String Coupling to Nuclear Fission come 1 Billion possible ways for S-World to create a company.

Super Coupling

Inspired by Sienna Skye

In 4,400 Words

Version 6.59-4r

Super Coupling , Step 8

Big Bang Inflation, String Coupling, String Quantum Mechanics, Black Holes & Nuclear Fission

E-TOE - Economic Theory of Everything

Step 8 (M-System 9). POP Part 2 – Super Coupling (2016 – 2017)

Within this step we apply an exercise relevant to all M-Systems, but especially M-Systems 2, 10, 11 and 14.

First, the objective is to show that with just one ‘D4’ standard S-World company and one basic rule, the result is that the S-World ‘D4’ standard company has the potential to grow and become all S-World ‘D14’ companies, engulfing the economy before ‘2080.’

Second, we present how (by having hundreds of millions of ways to form such a company) one way or another, by the time we get to 2080 and ‘Angel City 5, we will have succeeded in our desire to shape the future in a positive and beneficial way.

These hundreds of millions of ways to form S-World companies start their life as targets in the Angel City 5 2080 simulation, and becomes strings of opportunity sent back through time, from which via a process (not unlike renormalization) the results with the strongest probability of success become the first companies we create in our time.

super coupling - the theory of everything

To be sure with ripple effects, the more the better and the further the time, the greater the number of ripples needed. We initially targeted thousands of ways to send back strings of opportunity and ripple effects through time back from Angel City 5 in 2080 to Angel City 1 in 2020. But because we pushed on past the target we now have a billion opportunities to work backwards from.

And as a basic rule, we seek to double the amount of companies and POP investment each year.

super coupling - an economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

Super Coupling 1.01 – The Hawking-Green Equation

Within this step we apply an exercise relevant to M-System 2. ‘Ripple Effects and Elephants.’

Unlike Baby POP, which is used primarily for big networks of many companies, Super Coupling is a consideration for individual companies.

Originally called the ‘Hawking-Green Equation,’ as it was considered on a walk whilst listening to Professor Hawking’s ‘The Grand Design’ while considering Professor Michal Green’s string theory conundrum that (essentially) ‘a single string could in fact be the entire universe,’ per the Horizon documentary ‘How Small is the Universe.’

prof michael green on string theory

“The notion that this is the smallest constituent is paradoxically not at odds with the statement that it may also be the whole universe.”

Super Coupling 1.01 is POP without the train, a less rigid variation of the POP investment principle that see all sorts of different POP investment cubes across the world, investing into what seem like the most lucrative opportunities, but still working with POP points within the cubic financial gravity.

The thing about the ‘Hawking-Green Equation,’ that was in line with Green’s conundrum of how one could create the entire universe from a single string, was the simulation of ‘how a single company can engulf the global economy.’

pop part2 super coupling

When first applying this as a spreadsheet, it looked massive. And after a few explorations, the math showed that if a single S-World Villa Secrets company (can from its POP) overflow in its 3rd year onward, create enough POP investment to create 2 new companies per year, and each company it created followed suit; then…

So long as S-World had a solution for every business niche, the network of companies created could engulf the global economy before 2080.

the villa secrets network - economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

It’s important to note that before we created this point, we applied as much effort as has been seen for all 15 other M-Systems into M-System 1 and Villa Secrets. Seen here at www.villasecrets.com and summarised at network.villasecrets.com.

Soon, a long and well detailed book called ‘The Villa Secrets Secret’ will be added and then summarised as an individual Angel Theory chapter; which amongst other things shows us that we can create one single company which can create enough investment to create 2 companies in its 3rd year onward, in fact in could create 4.

POP Super Coupling 1.01 – Spreadsheet – 67 years

The Hawing-Green Equation

the hawing green equation

This large spreadsheet is made from 15 separate screenshots. To see it in detail, right click and download the image. Or to download the original in Excel file, click here.

The Parameters are:

New Company 1st Year NC Y1

New Company 2nd Year NC Y2

New Company 3rd Year POP Y1

1 Rule Applies

When we see a POP Y1, we add 2 NC Y1’s per year. (In the 3rd year and onwards, each company makes 2 new companies.)

Coming full circle, back to my crazy 2011 equation which lead to the Mandelbrot fractal and POP, the quality of doubling every second year is similar. If one can double every year, or in this case every second year, eventually one will beat and engulf standard economics.

In this example, we start with a single M-System 1. Villa Secrets ‘D4’ ‘Standard Company’ with a POP point of $167,772.16 that invests its POP into 2 new companies each year, where after each new company follows suite. And by 2080, this creates over 17 billion potential companies and a potential GDP of 11.5 gazillion dollars, beating a 3% inflated GDP target of half a gazillion in 2080 by 20 times.

Of course there are a million reasons why it would not work out. However, if you are starting with a billion opportunities, a trillion variables, and a gazillion ripple effects; the probability of success is high.

super coupling the economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

Since its conception this system has many physics influences beyond Professor Michael Green’s string theory.

At first as it was so explosive, a big bang inflation simulation was considered; but on examination and in particular from Professor Hawking, Super Coupling was found to be a lot less explosive than inflation.

So next, care of Professor Edward Witten (whose video is unfortunately no longer online) and Dr Amanda Peet’s ‘String Theory Legos for Black Holes:’ www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlDd2HtFfPU, came the idea of relating it to high string coupling.

At which point a book containing 10 chapters was written and added to AngelTheory.org:

POP Super Coupling and Angel POP

For Doctor Amanda Peet

By Nick Ray Ball from December 2016 to January 2017

pop super coupling and angel pop the theory of everything
www.AngelTheory.org/m-systems/pop-super-coupling-and-angel-pop-for-dr-amanda-peet-6-01

In which we realise we should not use high string coupling as it has no experimental equivalent. But we could instead consider a low string coupling simulation; where instead of many membranes (which in physics are simplest considered as universes) we simulate many businesses, and the quality that simulates the low coupling strength is the low amount of unmotivated paid by the hour staff vs. profit share rewarded stakeholders, which is one of the primary reasons why S-World business are set to be superior in the first place.

Consider… a business of 10,000 staff of which 1% are profit share or otherwise motivated vs. an identical network of companies that also has 10,000 personnel of which 50% are equality owners.

If given equal or superior systems, it is human nature for a large network of small owner-led companies to thoroughly outperform a large company of mostly paid by the hour unincentivized staff.

This ‘owner-led’ advantage was originally written as the character ‘Ѳ’ (O line-through) within the original Susskind Boost equation, but has now been converted into the ‘gs’ within the POP Super Coupling Basic 1.01 equation:

pop super coupling basic ecnomic theory of everything

N x gs = Ѫ

In this equation, the network character ‘Ѫ’ equals POP investment in the network. The ‘N’ changes from M-theory ‘branes’ to S-World ‘companies,’ and the ‘g s’ changes from coupling strength to the amount of motivated vs. unmotivated personnel, where a high amount of unmotivated personnel equals a high ‘gs.’

So, for example, a company that is completely comprised of profit share personnel may have a ‘g s’ of 1/10; and if so we might increase a projected 3-year forecast by 20%. Then a company with a 50/50 ratio of profit share personnel would have a ‘g s’ of 2/10 and no difference, where as a company of 25% motivated staff vs 75% unmotivated may have a ‘g s’ of 3/10 and so we decrease the projected 3-year profit forecast by 20%. Where after the higher the percentage of unmotivated staff, the higher the ‘g s’ and the higher the penalty we would apply to a 3-year profits forecast.

At this point we are only interested in creating companies with a ‘g s’ of 3 or less.

This makes a lot of sense, and it is the backbone of why we expect to outperform other business.

And it becomes a very compelling answer to the question: ‘How can we advance human potential and promote equal opportunity?’ (as both are served by this system).

the chan zuckerberg foundation an ecnomic theory of everything

Which is why we are approaching the Chan Zuckerberg foundation first, alongside Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Unite.

Thus, we are simply saying the amount of companies ‘N’ x their ‘gs’ (the companies low amount of unmotivated staff) equals their POP investment. However, the equation is not complete as each company POP point needs to be calculated or estimated individually; but as a quick way to make an approximation and see how big this thing can be, the simple ‘N x gs = Ѫ’ (network POP investment) will surface at this time.

Next, we add the string theory and the M-Systems that maintain the structural integrity of the POP generated financial gravity:

The Susskind Boost effects and boosts the financial output of all M-System 1’s companies. This is its algebraic variable equation

Ŝ = (Ḡ x ₰) Ť + Ŵ + Ƈ + Ḿ + ( Ř + ϒ) + Ð + Ð2>9

the susskind boost ecnomic theory of everything

Where Ḡ = Gross Profit and the (electric s) ₰ = is the S-World TBS™ (Total Business Systems) which so far for Villa Secrets creates 81 different ways to make money, save money or avoid landmines, many of which are unique.

Where after we add different boosting opportunities: Ť = Tenders or agency contracts, Ŵ = Additional Websites, Ƈ = Contracts &/or Mandates, Ḿ = The Marketing Multiplier, plus there are newer factors to add such as Ř = higher ROI advertising opportunities, and a (sort of palm tree Y symbol) ϒ = which accounts for network credits being pushed a company’s way.

Then from M-System 2 we add the dimension ‘Ð’ and the Ast⇔Bst which calculates the ripple effects from other businesses in the local network, and after in Ð2 to Ð9 and beyond we calculate the effects from other strings and ripples in the greater network.

We then see the Susskind Boost as the gross profit of each company multiplied by whatever boosting is applied to it, so adding the ‘x Ŝ’ (S-Hat Symbol) to the basic super coupling equation.

Making ‘N’ for the amount of companies, multiplied by ‘gs’ for the amount of incentivized personnel, multiplied by ‘Ŝ’ the Susskind Boost boosting profits, equals Ѫ POP investment in the network and special projects.

N x gs x Ŝ x = Ѫ

pop & the susskind boost an economic theory of everything

Again, this equation is an approximation as there are many different ways to boost, some like ₰ (the electric S) (The Total Business Systems) will become multipliers of additional revenue, and others like tenders will be an additional income. Then we follow Professor Susskind’s words:

‘We boost the hell out of the system along the Z axis (gross profit) until every single particle (company) has a huge momentum.

If there is any particle (company) that is going backwards along the Z axis (gross profit), you just have not boosted it enough.

Just boost it some more until it’s going forward with a large momentum.’

To apply this to the network, we change a particle for a company and the Z axis to gross profit. And in general, we always boost the weakest companies in the network until they are going forward and are creating a healthy POP investment.

The Susskind Boost helps maintain the integrity of the financial framework’s gravity by keeping the POP points all positive, so 64 out of 64 per cube. But if this is not enough, we call on M-System 0 the GGW-String to provide additional revenue for The Peet Tent to provide additional funding for the Susskind Boost.

Next, we apply M-System 4. The Peet Tent

pop & the peet tent an economic theory of everything

In general, Ŝ the Susskind Boost is good as an overall multiplier, and Ѧ the Peet Tent is good as a good overall limiting variable, for finding areas where the law of diminishing returns applies and other negative factors.

Above we have represented it as a division, albeit in practice one can have a very good Peet Tent and the Ѧ Peet Tent character jumps up to the top line of the equation so…

N x gs X Ŝ x Ѧ = Ѫ

In 2012, ‘The Peet Tent’ was first inspired by Dr Amanda Peet’s lecture String Theory for the Scientifically Curious in which Peet presents a string version of a Feynman diagram and explains how this makes string theory very economical.

The Peet Tent itself is an idea from a simulation of a String Feynman diagram where there are many places when an event can occur, and this leads to being able to accept the wildly diverging quantum calculations within the smooth realm of general relativity. So, making a quantum theory of gravity and ultimately creating the theory of everything.

the peet tent the economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

We simulate this by creating the network in such a way that any individual company within can have any financial result and still be in the game. If a poor result occurred, we can assign money from the GGW-String (that all contribute to) and boost the company back to health and profitably, maintaining the fabric of the financial network (as all 64 out of 64 companies in each 64-company strong network super cube are exceeding their POP points).

The Peet Tent & Quantum Safe Forecasting

From American Butterfly Book 3: ‘The Network on a String,’ The Peet Tent is a shape of the S-World string that protects companies from failure within the network. Plus, QSF or ‘Quantum Safe Forecasting’ borrows from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, making safer forecasts.

the peet tent & quantum safe forecasting

I shall not go into the algebraic math here; other than to say that in the top equation, the first 3 charters are different limiting variables, based on the Heisenberg uncertainty principle where simply by adding limiting variables, we increase the probability of matching or exceeding our POP targets.

And that in the second equation, we primarily look at the advantages and disadvantages of different locations.

This set of equations still needs quite some work, but the principle is that it looks for uncertainties, and only when few are found does it allows an S-World company to be created.

The Peet Tent and ‘Quantum Safe Forecasting’ create a worst-case scenario, and adjusts for different locations, different sized marketplaces, and different base costs. As seen in the next graphic, companies that pass the test move forwards to M-System 5 and beyond, and others move back to M-Systems 3, 2 and 1 to try again.

The Sum Over B-Strings

Next comes the sum of POP profit created by all the new companies created by the POP process.

pop sum over all new companies

For this we present new companies created as ‘Bst’ from my simple ‘Mother and Baby String’ equation M<>Bst ‘(pronounced ‘the M and B string,’) which was the foundation for M-System 2. In which ‘M’ is the mother company or network and ‘B’ is the baby produced and ‘st’ is the extended family, where the back and forwards arrows <> are the iteration created between the family unit.

This equation was later more practically adapted to Ast<>Bst (A string B string) which seeks to calculate the advantageous ripple effects of one company on another, and after on all companies on each other.

The Hawking-Green Equation

the hawking green equation economic theory of everything

Ŝ x Ѧ x N x gs + (Σ Bst) = Ѫ

The Susskind Boost x The Peet Tent x the number of companies x the number of incentivised personnel vs. unincentivized personnel + the sum of the output of all companies created by the POP process = Network POP investment.

Again, much like the other variables, there are different ways to apply the benefits of new companies contributing POP and the ‘Σ Bst’ (sum over B-Strings) is again an approximation.

This was the Hawking-Green Equation in full, which created the symmetry in business to Professor Michael Green’s statement on strings:

“The notion that this is the smallest constituent is paradoxically not at odds with the statement that it may also be the whole universe.”

As one single company using this POP method could engulf the entire economy.

‘P’ for Momentum

Next, we need to include ‘P’ for momentum, being the effects of PR, Branding, Brand associations, S-World Film, the Famous Concierge, and other exercises that increase demand for S-World products due to the public’s love of the brand; which considering S-World is in essence a progressive charity bent of changing the future of the human race to a more desired outcome, can be very significant.

Ŝ x Ѧ x N x gs x P + (Σ Bst) = Ѫ

pop gains momentum the economic theory of everything

Our decision to include branding expert Sir Richard Branson in our first company approach is testament to the respect we have for the branding opportunity that S-World can seize.

M-System 16 the virginverse

If the product and company is very popular, it will of course increase the momentum of the network. This is basic supply and demand; the more popular the product, the greater the demand.

The Angelverse Operating System

M-System 16.

angelverse an economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

The Angelverse Operating System is for big companies & foundations that have been licenced to create S-World companies. For instance, in the Villas/vacation rentals industry on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn there are hundreds of thousands of villa-related companies and venues.

S-World provides Angelverse Operating System licences for big companies & foundations to recruit their members &/or clients to S-World’s Systems.

This then becomes the beginning of the equation…

₳ x Ŝ x Ѧ x N x gs x P + (Σ Bst) = Ѫ

super coupling economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

Angelverses

Lastly, again within M-System 16 we have Angelverses which are medium and big companies wishing to create S-World companies and/ or adapt their existing companies to the network and the E-TOE, so creating another Sum over addition. Sum over all Angelverses.

super coupling an economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

₳ x Ŝ x Ѧ x N x gs x P + (Σ Bst) + (Σ ₳st) = Ѫ

Angelverse Operating System Recruitment x The Susskind Boost x The Peet Tent x Number of Companies x Number of Incentivised personnel + the sum of the output of all companies created by the POP process + The sum of all Angelverses = Network POP investment.

angelverse the economic theory of everything

How many Companies?

Now, we see how many different ways there are on founding an S-World company.

We start with the basic equation plus The Susskind Boost & The Peet Tent.

Ŝ x Ѧ x N x gs = Ѫ

super coupling

To apply numbers to it, first we consider that S-World Villa Secrets can/will create a network of more than 64 primary networks by 2021, each being 8 different companies; where after the primary network and/or Angelverse licensors recruit an addition of more than 56 more smaller local companies creating more than 4,096 individual companies.

If we add S-World VSN™ to the famous film & concierge department and make the company types: S-World Flies, Top End Real Estate, High-End Real Estate, S-World Holidays, Experience Africa Safaris, S-World Hotels, and S-World Business Travel; we could think to increase the 4,096 companies up a cubic dimension (which is simply to multiply by 8, so 4,096 x 8 = 32,768 companies).

However, for now, we shall save this potential and consider it part of the (Σ Bst) ‘Sum Over B-Strings.’

the hawking green equation economic theory of everything (E-TOE)

Next, we create the Hawking-Green Equation by adding the step (Σ Bst) ‘Sum Over B-Strings’ that was used to see a single ‘D4’ company engulf the economy by 2080.

Ŝ x Ѧ x N x gs + (Σ Bst) = Ѫ

As we saw from the spreadsheet earlier, this is a real game changer when you also include the companies made by companies and so on. This can at the least cause an expansion of a whole cubic dimension (so we multiply by 8) giving 32,768 companies.

(Note: The Theory of Every Business: Grand Networks, S-World UCS™ and the S-World TBS™ helps to move S-World into every conservable business type.)

super coupling - economic theory of everything

N x gs x Ŝ / Ѧ x P + (Σ Bst) = Ѫ

The P for momentum is another potential cubic multiplier, as brand development and brand love are achieved via our good intentions, the good things we do, the fun of it all, accelerated by S-World films based on Angel City 5 and the special projects.

Currently we are completely unknown, the PR made from just partnering with one of the trusties mentioned in Chapter 1 would increase our reach over 8 times.

So, multiplying by 8 due to branding, marketing and film increases our total to 262,144 companies.

For Angelverse Operating System Licensors

super coupling - the theory of everything

₳ x N x gs x Ŝ / Ѧ + (Σ Bst) x P = Ѫ

Now we add the Angelverses, big companies & foundations who are licensed to distribute the Angelverse Operating System. For instance, businesses on Facebook, LinkedIn or Twitter licensing to their members; Pfizer licencing to its clients, Disney licencing to its fans, and the list goes on.

This becomes another game changer, but this time we can potentially move up by more than 2 cubic dimensions. Working under the premise that we have created all the M-Systems and that we have expended the systems into every industry, Facebook alone could recruit millions of companies. Add to Facebook other companies across the world in every language recruiting and we could increase opportunities by 100.

Consider it from this perspective, at this point S-World has shown the potential to reach and make a deal that could be worth as much as $100,000 a year to 262,144 individual companies. So, we licence ‘the opportunity to make new companies’ to 100 licensors. Who can all offer their own additional incentives and are represented in every language.

The 100 licensors increase the reach of the network by 100 to 262,144,000

Sure the opportunities will be the same just through different Angelverses, but that’s all part of it. We want many different ways to temp businesses to S-World, and at the same time we want many different variations of the Angelverse Operating System to be created by the different Angelverses.

Sum Over Angelverses

super coupling - The Economic Theory of Everything (E-TOE)

Lastly, (thus far) we need to add existing big companies and even countries that wish to either create new joint S-World Angelverse ventures, or that wish to convert in full into E-TOE companies.

N x gs x Ŝ / Ѧ + (Σ Bst) x P + (Σ ₳st) = Ѫ

This is more of a long-term target; if we consider by the time we reach Angel City 4 in 2048, if we have 25% of Global GDP, all eyes will be on joining S-World. And at that point many businesses will see merit in adapting to a model that works with our system and goals.

This has the capacity to see the remaining 75% of GDP shift to S-World by 2080 and create in excess of a billion companies; which if we are considering a population of 10 billion, may be half the population at work the other half not, 2 billion company owners and 3 billion incentivised staff.

The lesson learned is that there are 1 billion possible ways for S-World to create a company and any single company via the Hawking-Green Equation can engulf the economy.

angelverses

Super Coupling Continued….

POP Super Coupling is also a bridge to quantum mechanics as Dr Amanda Peet presents: “In 1996, two Harvard physicists professors Andrew Strominger & Cumrun Vafa used a set of rules from string coupling to perform string quantum mechanics to calculate what the entropy of what a black hole would be, and it turned out to give exactly the same answer as the Bekenstein-Hawking experiments predicted 40 years earlier using pure quantum mechanics.”

professors strominger & vafa

The important point of the above is that by coming to the same conclusion using 2 different methods (quantum mechanics and string theory), it made the theoretical math of string theory much more likely to be correct in physics.

Another more recent consideration of Super Coupling was gleamed from the 6th chapter of Professor Michio Kaku’s ‘Parallel Worlds,’ where Super Coupling is not unlike nuclear fission, as explored by Niels Bohr and John Wheeler and the first experiments in creating the atomic bomb.

professor michio kaku

“Since everything in the quantum theory is a matter of probability and chance, Niels Bohr and John Wheeler estimated the probability that a neutron will break apart its uranium nucleus, releasing 2 or more neutrons, which then fission even more uranium nuclei, which then release ever more neutrons, and so on setting off a chain reaction capable of devastating a modern city.’

 

However, ‘In quantum mechanics, you can never know if any particular neutron will fission a uranium atom, but you can compute with incredible accuracy the probability that billions of uranium atoms will fission in a bomb.’

Professor Michio Kaku ‘Parallel Worlds’

nuclear fission an economic theory of everything

Considering the above, we look at our Hawking-Green Equation which tells us in theory a single company could engulf the global economy.

However, in terms of creating one company per Michal Green’s ‘one string can become the universe scenario’; even if it can be shown to work on paper, we cannot realistically predict the outcome in terms of all the future companies that can be created from it.

And why would we? POP is slow at the beginning, and it would be 2 or 3 years before we saw the next company was created. Instead we have a billion ways to create companies, and a general intent to make the software, expand rapidly then later seek to double the size of the network each year.

super coupling - the economic theory of everything

Now, we go to quantum systems M-System 4. Quantum Safe Forecasting and the ‘Feynman Sum Over Histories’ systems… M-Systems 13. S-World UCS Voyagers & M-System 14. Angel Cities.

The Network on a String

Angel Theory – Paradigm Shift: Book 2. 

Backstory / Prequel

An Economic Theory of Everything

By Nick Ray Ball 15th November 2017

An Economic Theory of Everything - The E-TOE

PRESENTING:

Chapter 3: The Network on a String

An Economic Theory of Everything Part 3: How the String Theory Systems maintain the integrity of the Financial Gravity and create Equality.

The Network on a String

Inspired by Sienna Skye

In 4,095 Words

Version 6.59-3r

Index

The Susskind Boost

Step 10. (M-System 3) ‘The Susskind Boost’ (April 2016)

The GGW String

Step 11 (M-System 0) – The GGW String (Greene/Green/Witten) (Late 2016)

The Peet Tent

Step 12 (M-System 4) – The Peet Tent (Nov 2012 to 2018)

Baby POP, Grand-Networks, POP Trains and The Boat

Step 6b (M-System 5) – POP (Point of Profitability) (2012)

SUSY Hierarchal Spin Equalizer

Step 9. (Various M-Systems) The SUSY Hierarchal Spin Equalizer (2012)

Angel POP Equality – 2012 to 2017

Step 7. (M-System 15). Angel POP Equality Systems (2012 – 2017)


Grand Networks in areas of Abject Poverty are Special Projects

Step 7. (M-System 15). Angel POP – Grand Networks in areas of Abject Poverty are Special Projects (2016 – 2017)

 

Step 10. (M-System 3). The Susskind Boost (April 2016)

Source: Leonard Susskind-Lecture 1 | String Theory and M-Theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25haxRuZQUk

Susskind on String Theory

‘We boost the hell out of the system along the Z axis (gross profit) until every single particle (company) has a huge momentum.

If there is any particle (company) that is going backwards along the Z axis (gross profit), you just have not boosted it enough.

Just boost it some more until it’s going forward with a large momentum.’

To apply this to the network, we change a particle for a company and the Z axis to gross profit. And in general, we always boost the weakest companies in the network until they are going forward and are creating a healthy POP investment.

The Susskind Boost

There are tonnes of ways to boost a company’s profit without giving direct financial assistance.
Here are some options: Ť the award of tenders, Ŵ additional websites, Ƈ = contracts or mandates, and in addition: higher ROI advertising, or making a company’s goods or services a preferred purchase for those who have network credits (Planck Cubits).

The Susskind Boost

However, if a company is in actual trouble, we apply ‘The Peet Tent,’ the shape of the GGW String that assists troubled companies, giving them the lift to be boosted further by The Susskind Boost; which will continue to boost the companies until they are creating POP again, so repairing the integrity of each network’s cube until we see 64/64 across the board. This process never ends, but will become mostly unnecessary for established cubes when the network becomes massive.

 

Step 11 (M-System 0) – The GGW String (Greene/Green/Witten) (Late 2016)

The GGW String

Named after the 3 physicists: Brian Greene, Michael Green & Edward Witten, who from 2012 to 2016 assisted my basic understanding of string theory.

String Thoery

The GGW string considers the most fundamental properties of string theory; ‘the strings themselves’ and that a good simulation in economics is for strings to be equivalent to the money earned by the S-World Network (the holding company/foundation/operating system), and the different ways we spend the money are the different shapes of the strings.

Instead of POP investment, the GGW String primarily receives its income from the gross profit from each company within the network.

However, after reading ‘The Real Crash’ by Peter Schiff, a solid case was made for lowering or removing direct taxes on company’s income. Remember POP only applies after a company has done very well, and even then, it’s an investment not a tax. But the GGW-String income is a direct tax on profits.

One can say that such a direct tax on gross profit is the equivalent to a standard franchise fee. However, in creating M-System 1. Villa Secrets, it was decided that the 5% equivalent of a franchise fee should be lowered closer to 2.5%, at least until the bulk of the systems were developed. And that the 2.5% be used almost exclusively for web, software, and network development; creating the systems that directly increased profit for the networks thus creating a Nash Equilibrium.

A Nash Equilibrium

Professor John Nash, winner of 2 Nobel Prizes and famous for being the subject of the Oscar winning film ‘A Beautiful Mind.’

A Nash Equilibrium is most often seen within game theory, it is in essence a win/win scenario, where one would choose the same outcome regardless of enforcement.

In the case of S-World Villa Secrets and the 2.5% of turnover contribution towards the development of software and the network, this is forecasted to return from 25% to over 100%. So, to make a 25% or more increase from a 2.5% contribution is an action any sane company or individual would choose to make; hence a Nash Equilibrium, at least of sorts.

However, it is quite possible that at a later point, this percentage will increase to provide some GGW String funding, which may be fully exclusive to the Susskind Boost and Peet Tent and seen as an insurance contribution, insuring the integrity of the network and every business within.

 

Step 12 (M-System 4) – The Peet Tent (Nov 2012 to 2017)

The Peet Tent

The Peet Tent was the principle of physics from American Butterfly in 2012 that became the foundation for Angel Theory’s M-Systems in March 2016.

But first a little history. Before starting S-World in 2011, between 2008 and 2011 while researching the Virgin network, it was noted that Sir Richard Branson made mention that the Virgin Network is a network of different companies (as is S-World). But in the case of Virgin (and most such groups), if one company failed, it was detached from all others, so all others were safe. This is of course the sensible way to create a network and was respected, but it was not in the spirit of ‘A Theory of Every Business.’

The Peet Tent is the answer to this dilemma

The Peet Tent is the answer to this dilemma

Sources:

  1. Dr Amanda Peet: String Theory for the Scientifically Curious https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpQngpaHamg
  2. American Butterfly Book 3 ‘The Network on a String’
    http://americanbutterfly.org/pt3/the-network-on-a-string/cfm-pop-analogies.
  3. Dr Amanda Peet: String Theory Legos for Black Holes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlDd2HtFfPU

The Peet Tent is a shape of the S-World string that protects companies from failure within the network.

Below on the right, we see what is known as a ‘String Feynman Diagram’ (also known as a baggy pants diagram) adapted to M-Systems, where instead of partials we see positive and negative financial results within the boundary of the pants/tent.

The Peet Tent

In string theory this is it, the theory of everything; as this is how the jittery and unpredictable results from quantum mechanics unify with the smooth results from general relativity (Einstein’s theory of gravity) as they all fit within the string theory Feynman diagram’s baggy tent. This is also why string theory is said to be a very economic theory.
In the end, the simulation in economics was simple enough (albeit it would take years to work out), one must make provision for companies in trouble. If applying the Susskind Boost did not work by adjusting opportunities, one must apply The Peet Tent; which provides direct income to the Susskind Boost, so boosting troubled companies back to health and then fitness.
This works equally for companies on their way to POP and for companies that have achieved POP but have fallen backwards.

So long as there was enough income in the GGW String, all companies are safe, permanently.

Professor Edward Witten, Standard and String Feynman Diagrams

Ed Witten

Above we see Professor Edward Witten present both the standard Feynman diagram in quantum mechanics and the string version; and as you can see in the standard quantum version, there is no tent at all, hence only by using string theory can the physics be unified, so creating a TOE.

The Peet Tent Limited Liabilities

For now, before the system is massive, there are some practical limitations such as provisions against lawsuits that would not have been made if not for the potentially deep pockets of The GGW String, and the many systems of M-System 1 and especially S-World TFS™ (Total Financial System) and S-World CRM CC™ (Company Controller); which collectively keeps a careful watch of every penny made and spent by every company, so we can see problems before they occur, which can mostly be fixed via better management and The Susskind Boost.

The Peet Tent Limited Liabilities

And in addition, comes Step 13. QSF (Quantum Safe Forecasting) which we shall look at shortly.

Before we carry on let’s see the system architecture again.

So far, we have looked at the original chaos theory inspired POP Steps 1 to 6, plus the string theory Steps 10 to 12; which creates the network’s underlying financial gravity and maintains its integrity. Next, we move onto Step 6b ‘Baby POP’ and see the creation of a cube of grand networks and ‘the boat.’

E-TOE Ecnomic Theory Of Everything

Baby POP Symmetries

 

Step 6b (M-System 5) – Baby POP – Grand Networks POP Train & Boat (2012)

Baby POP and the Boat

Baby POP was a derivative of the original POP investment principle for super grand networks that required a large investment and POP point for an initial super-grand network, but smaller investments and POP points for its offspring.
Like Classic POP, Baby POP invests per the train method; in fact, Baby POP is the same as Classic POP, just the POP point for new grand networks created is lower. This story is told in detail as the introduction to American Butterfly Book 3: The Network on a String (circa 2012).

http://americanbutterfly.org/pt3/the-network-on-a-string/prequal-CFM-and-POP

The Baby POP Train

Here is the original graphic, showing now 16 grand networks investing per the train method of POP which eventually creates ‘The Boat.’ Full of investment profit, set for new adventures.

M-System Baby POP and the Boat

One thing that needs clarification is why is this model seems less explosive than the original, which after the 11th year created 2 new networks per year. The reason for this is in part due to being cautious in our estimations as middle networks have less tenders, but in addition because Baby POP has lower POP points for its offspring, there is not as much pressure.

To recap, once the original super grand network had reached its POP point, all additional profit pours into the creation of a new network. And later when this new network reaches its POP point, both the mother and baby networks combine to feed a third, and then a fourth until all 16 grand networks are making their POP investments in a train pouring their collective POP profit into what we called ‘The Boat,’ ready to sail away to fund the start a new super-grand network.

Next, we move to the great universal equaliser SUSY or SUperSYmmetry.

 

Step 9. The SUSY Hierarchal Spin Equalizer (2012)

The SUSY Hierarchal Spin Equalizer

SUSY stands for Supersymmetry, the component that is added to string theory that created M-theory and a multi universal theory of everything.

The SUSY Hierarchal Spin Equalizer was created for the second grand network design, ‘The Orlando Network’ in 2012, to smooth out and even the POP investment capital of the networks within.

Based on a real-world plot of 9 square miles of land priced at $100million located near Orlando; over 2011 and 2012, a super-grand network was costed, and per Baby POP method was set to create 15 grand networks. However, when the expected POP profit from all were tallied up, it made for a very unpredictable picture, which to a degree was OK as all were in POP, and so the underlying financial gravity was solid.

But, was there a way to make the post POP profit made from each grand network more predictable?

To create evenness within the 16 networks, in the Autumn of 2012, the rather grandly titled SUSY Hierarchal Spin Equalizer was theorised.

http://americanbutterfly.org/pt3/the-network-on-a-string/susy-hierarchal-spin-equalizer

The SUSY Hierarchal Spin Equalizer

Below we see the original forecast for 2040 and the expected revenue generated by the 16 networks, which as we can see is a very random affair. Some will do well, particularly in the beginning due to tenders (Ť) such as contracts in construction, and at the end network due to the boat, but networks 6 to 15 were a lottery. Which, when we consider that M-Systems is based on making a less chaotic and more predicable economy, is not ideal.

The SUSY Hierarchal Spin Equalizer 1

So, from a short video on Supersymmetry; the idea arose that for every particle, there is an equal and opposite particle.

This presented the idea of twinning all the 16 networks, so the weakest and strongest become one supersymmetric network, and the rest followed suite. This is why we have sets of 16 grand networks, because we twin the strongest and weakest to make 8 relatively similar supersymmetric networks, which in turn become a higher dimensional (D8) network cube.

The results are seen in the following graphic, in which we see that as supersymmetric pairs, all the grand networks have similar combined profit.

(Note in case anyone was wondering what the PQS is, it was the 2012 name for M-Systems – ‘Predictive Quantum Software’)

The SUSY Hierarchal Spin Equalizer 2

However, whilst this was a lot tidier and looked out for the little guy, it would always be seen as a penalty/tax of sorts to the stronger networks.

So, if instead of seeing the ‘POP boat’ (being the overflow of profit from all 16 grand networks) floating away to create a new grand network in a different location, once the last network has achieved POP; the boat will instead first invest into the weakest networks (per Susskind Boost method) until eventually all 16 networks become massive, and turn into super-grand-networks and a (D9) cube, which is 8 times as profitable as a D8 cube, an objective all companies in the network would love to achieve.

And because the networks are all entangled, boosting the weakest has the same effect as boosting the strongest, which for the stronger networks is the pay back from entangling the strings in the first place.

Chapter 2. Part 1e. Angel POP Dimensions

 

Step 7. (M-System 15). Angel POP (2012 – 2017)

Angel POP

Angel POP enables all special projects. It is the magic supersymmetric source that underpins the S-World global network philanthropic, ecological, social and complexity saving ambitions; first described in November 2012 in Chapter 7 of American Butterfly Book 3, ‘The Network on a String’ http://americanbutterfly.org/pt3/the-network-on-a-string/angel-pop-global-benefits.

Angel POP creates symmetries between prime investment opportunities and opportunities that, without the Angel POP framework, would be considered economically unviable (an abject network).

And it restricts the growth of the network so that for every prime network created, there must also be one or more abject networks.

This system works in 2 ways:

  1. Complexly by creating a financial dimension such as ‘D8,’ where after all 8 continental cubes must be fully invested before any D9 options become available.or…
  2. Simply by twinning the first two networks as we create one in say California and another maybe in Malawi.

We shall look at Method 1 first, as that was the original inspiration.

Method 1. String & M-Theory Dimensions

String and M-Theory Dimensions

One thing about string theory that makes most of us scratch our heads is that its mathematics only works in 10 or 11 dimensions. The 3 spatial dimensions we know (length, width, height) plus ‘time’ gives us our known 4 dimensions. But string theory adds 6 tiny curled up dimensions, so small we cannot see them. And M-theory adds the 11th dimension as a framework within which many universes, including our own, live.

I am yet to find a book or video on the mathematics of how these 11 dimensions work, which leads to the conclusion that the math must be too complex to be explained simply.

String and M-Theory Dimensions

Within M-Systems we too work in dimensions, but they are very simple to understand as they are cubed. Which is simply a multiplication of an existing dimension by 8 as seen below. So, we fit 8 cubes within a 2nd dimension 8-cube, and 8 second dimensional cubes make a 3<sup<rd dimensional 64-cube, and the 4th dimension is the 512-cube and so on.

POP Cubes

Let’s see this in practice…

$0.01 > $0.08 > $0.64 > $5.12 > $40.96
>

$327.68 D1 Abject Poverty Company (Can be a single person)
$2,621.44 D2 Relative Poverty Company
$20,971.52 D3 Small Company
$167,772.16 D4 Standard Company (Primary Network in Abject Location)
$1,342,177.28 D5 1st Tear Network (Primary Network in Relative Location)
$10,737,418.24 D6 2nd Tear Network (Primary Network in Prime Location)
$85,899,345.92 D7 Grand Network (Small Resort Development)
$687,194,767.36 D8 Super Grand Network (Large Resort Development)
$5,497,558,138.88 D9 8 Global Network Cubes #1
$43,980,465,111.04 D10 Once D9 is full it opens D10
$351,843,720,888.32 D11 Angel City 2 Target (2024) (Only opens if there is no D1)
$2,814,749,767,106.56 D12 Angel City 3 Target (2032) (Only opens if there is no D2)
$22,517,998,136,852.50 D13 Angel City 4 Target (2048)
$180,143,985,094,820.00 D14 Angel City 5 POP Target (2080)
$1,441,151,880,758,560.00 D14 Angel City 5 Turnover Target (2080)

Note that in the same way we must include the lowest paid company, being D1, where some individuals would for a dollar a day in countries in abject poverty. We must also in D14 account for the maximum market share (being all of GDP) expected in 2080. (Working on an increase in current GDP of 3% a year making $508 trillion, which may be increased (but not inflated) by about 180% due to the majesty of the E-TOE & M-Systems.)

How Angel POP works on a macroscale is to create 8 even continental network cubes and restrict investment into the richer cubes once they reach a specific POP point. Once any continental cube generates more than this amount, its POP investment needs to be invested in the cubes that have not reached their POP point. And only once all 8 continental cubes are in POP (are making more than their POP point), does the next dimension open.

Continental Networks

The important simple but very powerful point on the mathematics which made Angel POP the champion of American Butterfly is when working in this way, one finds that due to the power of the POP investment train, the last companies in a closed/restricted network (which would usually be the least economically desirable locations), get made very quickly due to the pressure of all the other continental networks POP profit channelling into them. And that the very last 1% of the cube, which would be the least desirable locations on the planet, will be fully invested in no time at all.

And so, when investment is generated, any location specified within the current dimension
will eventually become a success; and due to this quality of Angel POP, it makes such investments appetising in the first place.

Angel POP

And that’s ‘Angel POP’

From the first principle, the simple idea that if the S-World network is successful, then even the most undesirable economic locations become desirable due to their predetermined eventual success. If the S-World Network becomes massive, all locations designated as networks will be a success.

This system is the exact opposite of a pyramid scheme, as where a pyramid scheme does not make anything, S-World Networks make everything and is a theory of every business; continually budding into new small owner-led companies, made super-competitive due to the systems and the gravity of the network.

Angel POP

Instead of a pyramid we have a cube; and within, a circular butterfly effect. As at the end of the journey, we start again from the beginning but with greater force, as is seen in the following 2016 system design.

From a physics analogy perspective, we present a theory in the making ‘POP-C.’

Consider Einstein’s Special Relativity and the law of diminishing returns in terms of reaching the speed of light (the ‘C’ in Einstein’s E=MC2).

Note we are not following the math precisely, it’s just an analogy that seems to fit the model, which demonstrates that the Angel POP system has a law of accelerating returns.

When Travelling at 90% of the speed of light, time slows down by about 50%. And if one is at 0.004% of the speed of light then time slows down by 25 times; and the faster you go, the slower time travels. And in fact, one can never reach the speed of light as time would stand still.

In comparison (but in reverse), when a closed POP dimension such as D9 is at about 90% completion, time speeds up (the time it takes to create the network is faster) and at 99% it gets very fast, and at 99.9% its velocity is huge, which completes the Network dimension ‘D9’ at record pace, and opens ‘D10’ despite 25% or so of ‘D9’ being applied to countries in abject poverty.

Angel POP

Angel POP Dimensional Math

One point on the math, before D11 can open, we would like to have eradicated all D1 (abject poverty) within a certain catchment area from grand networks constructed. And whilst this is, to a degree, contorting the model to fit with the 10 dimensions + time of M-theory; having made the contortion, it seems suited to the model.

Albeit there is a good argument that we should work in 9 spatial dimensions not 10, as the M-theory dimension is equivalent to the Angel Theory framework (answers on a postcard please?).

angel pop

Original Angel POP Principle (2012)

The original Angel POP principle was written in D14 (14 cubic dimensions) extreme macroeconomics within American Butterfly.org and by 2080 demanded 32,768 different grand or super grand networks, spread evenly across the world. This figure was primarily based on the number of medical facilities and operation centres needed so that everyone on the planet was close to a medical facility, and that each operation centre could locally create economic opportunities.

And while this sounds like a lot, when we break it down (prior to the mid-21st century), we are only looking at 1 grand network per continental cube every 4 years.

Of the 32,768 virtual networks only 4,096 need to be physical grand networks, the rest can be virtual (grand networks not attached to a real estate development). We then must divide by 8 for the continental cubes leaving 512 physical networks per territory. Which we further divide by 16, due to the magic of Baby POP, which leaves us with 32 grand networks over 64 years. So, one every 2 years, or one network every 4 years for the first 32 years, and 1 every year thereafter.

angel pop2

Angel POP Method 2. Twinning (applying a symmetry) to the first two networks

The beauty of Angel POP is that it creates symmetries between prime investment opportunities and opportunities that, without the Angel POP framework, would be considered economically undesirable. Where an economically desirable S-World virtual network opportunity such as Villa Secrets California is twinned with an undesirable economic opportunity such as a grand network (resort development) in a location in abject poverty such as in Malawi (Lake Malawi).

By creating strong networks of S-World companies in California, starting with Villa Secrets and moving into all real estate and travel then beyond, with each company contributing at least half its POP investment into the Lake Malawi (or other abject location); the stronger we become in California, the stronger our abject network becomes.

Working in this way and working on a principle that for every virtual network in a prosperous location, a grand network is built in a location of poverty; as the network grows, it does so evenly across the world bringing opportunities to locations of abject poverty. And because of this:

 

“Grand Networks in areas of Abject Poverty are Special Projects

Angel POP

Because of Angel POP we are creating a system where everyone who works within, be it a film star, a rocket scientist, a domestic helper, a construction worker, or a teacher; no matter their location, all contribute to the special projects and making our utopian 2080 Angel City 5 vison a reality.
POP is the system that turns a technology solution from one that threatens jobs to one that creates them. A variation on Sam Altman’s (Y Combinator’s) vison for the future where technology has helped the world to the degree that most of the world are paid for to do nothing, but incorporating the Chan Zuckerberg philosophy of helping people to reach their potential, where people have a choice to work or not.

Because of Angel POP, we turn a set of super-capitalist businesses into what may well be the most progressive charity project on the planet. A point that we shall present to the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, as in many ways their model inspired ours; and Facebook founder Dustin Moskovitz’s www.openphilanthropy.org who asks, ‘How can we accomplish as much good as possible?’

Angel POP

The Gates Code, Supersymmetry, Simulated Universes & President Obama

Dr James Gates and President Obama

Shortly before writing Angel POP, I was intrigued with Gates’ paper in Physics World, ‘Symbols of Power,’ in which Gates found web browser correcting code within the equations for supersymmetry, the multi universal theory that was added to string theory to make M-theory.

This curiosity changed my view on the creation of S-World virtual network from a virtual world to a simulated universe (more on this in later chapters).