M-Theory, an Economic Science?

In M-Systems, we create a digital economic network, virtual in design and entangle its structure with conditions and laws found in nature as described by M-theory. But why would we do this? And can M-theory be the foundation for an economic and business science?

In Professor Hawking’s recent TOE (Theory of Everything) book ‘The Grand Design’ co-written with Leonard Mlodinow in 2010, Hawking and Mlodinow presents a very simple but very solid thread for why following the laws of nature as described by M-theory would be an advantage.

“The laws of nature are meant to economically compress a number of particular cases into one simple formula.”

When designing a system for oneself, one has an infinite amount of options. And each is its own theory, which may or may not work out the way one planned. By following the laws of nature one has not only a road map of sorts, one is benefiting from billions of years of fine-tuning. And due to that fine-tuning the components in the system are economically compressed. So, all parts of the system work well together, even if there was no strict plan for such by the designer.

One will be amazed at just how many ripple effects run through this system and how many synergies there are. So many things just seem to fall in place after adopting the M-theory influenced model.

To conclude this series on the writing of Professor Hawking, again from the Grand Design comes the notion that…

“Though that is distasteful to some, scientist must accept theories that agree with experiment, not their own preconceived notions.”

So, the bottom-line is simple…S-World is a business and economic theory. However, until it is massive, it is only a theory of business. Thus, the benchmark is set. When S-World becomes massive, scientists who disagree with the notion of “M-Theory, an economic system?’ will need to re-assess. Every dollar made up to that point and past that point is a small experiment that agrees with the theory.